REVIEW 3 cited by
Large Language Models are Effective Priors for Causal Graph Discovery
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Causal structure discovery from observations can be improved by integrating background knowledge provided by an expert to reduce the hypothesis space. Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) have begun to be considered as sources of prior information given the low cost of querying them relative to a human expert. In this work, firstly, we propose a set of metrics for assessing LLM judgments for causal graph discovery independently of the downstream algorithm. Secondly, we systematically study a set of prompting designs that allows the model to specify priors about the structure of the causal graph. Finally, we present a general methodology for the integration of LLM priors in graph discovery algorithms, finding that they help improve performance on common-sense benchmarks and especially when used for assessing edge directionality. Our work highlights the potential as well as the shortcomings of the use of LLMs in this problem space.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
KG-SoftMAP: Soft Knowledge-Graph Priors for Bayesian Network Structure Learning from Sparse Discrete Data
KG-SoftMAP incorporates soft, confidence-weighted priors from a knowledge graph into MAP estimation for Bayesian network structure learning, recovering substantial directed structure from sparse discrete data where da...
-
EviDAG: Auditable Causal DAG Authoring with Biomedical Literature
EviDAG converts free-text study variables into an auditable, constraint-checked causal DAG whose edges carry verified, quoted evidence from a frozen PubMed snapshot.
-
LLM Cannot Discover Causality, and Should Be Restricted to Non-Decisional Support in Causal Discovery
LLMs are unreliable causal reasoners, so they should be limited to non-decisional search support in causal discovery algorithms.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.