REVIEW 2 cited by
Marrying Causal Representation Learning with Dynamical Systems for Science
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Causal representation learning promises to extend causal models to hidden causal variables from raw entangled measurements. However, most progress has focused on proving identifiability results in different settings, and we are not aware of any successful real-world application. At the same time, the field of dynamical systems benefited from deep learning and scaled to countless applications but does not allow parameter identification. In this paper, we draw a clear connection between the two and their key assumptions, allowing us to apply identifiable methods developed in causal representation learning to dynamical systems. At the same time, we can leverage scalable differentiable solvers developed for differential equations to build models that are both identifiable and practical. Overall, we learn explicitly controllable models that isolate the trajectory-specific parameters for further downstream tasks such as out-of-distribution classification or treatment effect estimation. We experiment with a wind simulator with partially known factors of variation. We also apply the resulting model to real-world climate data and successfully answer downstream causal questions in line with existing literature on climate change.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Learning General Causal Structures with Hidden Dynamic Process for Climate Analysis
CaDRe jointly recovers latent dynamic processes and observed causal graphs from time-series data, with identifiability theory and competitive climate forecasting.
-
"Cause" is Mechanistic Narrative within Scientific Domains: An Ordinary Language Philosophical Critique of "Causal Machine Learning"
The authors argue that causality is domain-specific mechanistic narrative, so causal machine learning methods cannot, on their own, certify true causes outside narrow physical or engineered systems.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.