REVIEW 2 cited by
Modeling Other Players with Bayesian Beliefs for Games with Incomplete Information
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Bayesian games model interactive decision-making where players have incomplete information -- e.g., regarding payoffs and private data on players' strategies and preferences -- and must actively reason and update their belief models (with regard to such information) using observation and interaction history. Existing work on counterfactual regret minimization have shown great success for games with complete or imperfect information, but not for Bayesian games. To this end, we introduced a new CFR algorithm: Bayesian-CFR and analyze its regret bound with respect to Bayesian Nash Equilibria in Bayesian games. First, we present a method for updating the posterior distribution of beliefs about the game and other players' types. The method uses a kernel-density estimate and is shown to converge to the true distribution. Second, we define Bayesian regret and present a Bayesian-CFR minimization algorithm for computing the Bayesian Nash equilibrium. Finally, we extend this new approach to other existing algorithms, such as Bayesian-CFR+ and Deep Bayesian CFR. Experimental results show that our proposed solutions significantly outperform existing methods in classical Texas Hold'em games.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Tail-Risk-Safe Monte Carlo Tree Search under PAC-Level Guarantees
Two new Monte Carlo tree search algorithms, CVaR-MCTS and W-MCTS, give provable PAC-level tail-risk controls and regret bounds for worst-case outcome scenarios.
-
Tunable Leg Stiffness in a Monopedal Hopper for Energy-Efficient Vertical Hopping Across Varying Ground Profiles
For a hopper with adjustable leg stiffness, softer legs give higher steady-state hops on soft, damped ground while stiffer legs give higher hops on hard, undamped ground.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.