REVIEW 3 cited by
Scaling Law for Time Series Forecasting
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Scaling law that rewards large datasets, complex models and enhanced data granularity has been observed in various fields of deep learning. Yet, studies on time series forecasting have cast doubt on scaling behaviors of deep learning methods for time series forecasting: while more training data improves performance, more capable models do not always outperform less capable models, and longer input horizons may hurt performance for some models. We propose a theory for scaling law for time series forecasting that can explain these seemingly abnormal behaviors. We take into account the impact of dataset size and model complexity, as well as time series data granularity, particularly focusing on the look-back horizon, an aspect that has been unexplored in previous theories. Furthermore, we empirically evaluate various models using a diverse set of time series forecasting datasets, which (1) verifies the validity of scaling law on dataset size and model complexity within the realm of time series forecasting, and (2) validates our theoretical framework, particularly regarding the influence of look back horizon. We hope our findings may inspire new models targeting time series forecasting datasets of limited size, as well as large foundational datasets and models for time series forecasting in future work. Code for our experiments has been made public at https://github.com/JingzheShi/ScalingLawForTimeSeriesForecasting.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Accurate and Efficient Multivariate Time Series Forecasting via Offline Clustering
FOCUS forecasts multivariate time series by learning segment prototypes offline and attending to these prototypes online, achieving linear complexity and claimed state-of-the-art accuracy on seven benchmark datasets.
-
How Does the Spatial Distribution of Pre-training Data Affect Geospatial Foundation Models?
Balanced, globally representative pre-training data generally outperforms region-specific sampling for two geospatial foundation models in few-shot downstream tasks, and the advantage shrinks as finetuning data grows.
-
TAB: Unified Benchmarking of Time Series Anomaly Detection Methods
TAB is a new time series anomaly detection benchmark that unifies datasets, methods, and evaluation protocols, and its results show classical methods remain highly competitive against deep learning and foundation models.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.