Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Large Language Models can Deliver Accurate and Interpretable Time Series Anomaly Detection

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.15370 v1 pith:HITAN6WK submitted 2024-05-24 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords detectionllmadtsadanomalyllmsemploysmodelsseries
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Time series anomaly detection (TSAD) plays a crucial role in various industries by identifying atypical patterns that deviate from standard trends, thereby maintaining system integrity and enabling prompt response measures. Traditional TSAD models, which often rely on deep learning, require extensive training data and operate as black boxes, lacking interpretability for detected anomalies. To address these challenges, we propose LLMAD, a novel TSAD method that employs Large Language Models (LLMs) to deliver accurate and interpretable TSAD results. LLMAD innovatively applies LLMs for in-context anomaly detection by retrieving both positive and negative similar time series segments, significantly enhancing LLMs' effectiveness. Furthermore, LLMAD employs the Anomaly Detection Chain-of-Thought (AnoCoT) approach to mimic expert logic for its decision-making process. This method further enhances its performance and enables LLMAD to provide explanations for their detections through versatile perspectives, which are particularly important for user decision-making. Experiments on three datasets indicate that our LLMAD achieves detection performance comparable to state-of-the-art deep learning methods while offering remarkable interpretability for detections. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that directly employs LLMs for TSAD.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. C-RE-ACT: Causal RE-ACTing Agent for O-RAN Forensic Triage

    cs.NI 2026-07 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    An agentic O-RAN triage system that ranks root causes via SAM causal discovery and graph soft-prompting claims 89% top-3 accuracy on 140 testbed experiments.

  2. Foundation Models for Anomaly Detection: Vision and Challenges

    cs.LG 2025-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey that taxonomizes foundation-model-based anomaly detection into encoder, detector, and interpreter roles and lists open challenges.

Pith tools