Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

The Mosaic Memory of Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.15523 v2 pith:YQMS7XRY submitted 2024-05-24 cs.CL cs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords memorizationllmsmosaicdatamemorymodelssequenceswidely
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

As Large Language Models (LLMs) become widely adopted, understanding how they learn from, and memorize, training data becomes crucial. Memorization in LLMs is widely assumed to only occur as a result of sequences being repeated in the training data. Instead, we show that LLMs memorize by assembling information from similar sequences, a phenomena we call mosaic memory. We show major LLMs to exhibit mosaic memory, with fuzzy duplicates contributing to memorization as much as 0.8 of an exact duplicate and even heavily modified sequences contributing substantially to memorization. Despite models display reasoning capabilities, we somewhat surprisingly show memorization to be predominantly syntactic rather than semantic. We finally show fuzzy duplicates to be ubiquitous in real-world data, untouched by deduplication techniques. Taken together, our results challenge widely held beliefs and show memorization to be a more complex, mosaic process, with real-world implications for privacy, confidentiality, model utility and evaluation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Counterfactual Influence as a Distributional Quantity

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Near-duplicate training samples lower a model's self-influence on a record while raising its extractability, so self-influence alone underestimates memorization risk.

Pith tools