REVIEW 1 cited by
A Cross-Dataset Study for Text-based 3D Human Motion Retrieval
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
We provide results of our study on text-based 3D human motion retrieval and particularly focus on cross-dataset generalization. Due to practical reasons such as dataset-specific human body representations, existing works typically benchmarkby training and testing on partitions from the same dataset. Here, we employ a unified SMPL body format for all datasets, which allows us to perform training on one dataset, testing on the other, as well as training on a combination of datasets. Our results suggest that there exist dataset biases in standard text-motion benchmarks such as HumanML3D, KIT Motion-Language, and BABEL. We show that text augmentations help close the domain gap to some extent, but the gap remains. We further provide the first zero-shot action recognition results on BABEL, without using categorical action labels during training, opening up a new avenue for future research.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
HumanTracker: Towards Comprehensive and Human-Aligned Motion Tracking Benchmark
HumanTracker introduces a 153-hour categorized humanoid tracking benchmark and a preference-trained metric, HumanScore, that agrees with human judgments better than kinematic error metrics.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.