Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Cross-Dataset Study for Text-based 3D Human Motion Retrieval

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.16909 v1 pith:6KRWGZSF submitted 2024-05-27 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords trainingdatasethumanresultsactionbabelbodycross-dataset
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We provide results of our study on text-based 3D human motion retrieval and particularly focus on cross-dataset generalization. Due to practical reasons such as dataset-specific human body representations, existing works typically benchmarkby training and testing on partitions from the same dataset. Here, we employ a unified SMPL body format for all datasets, which allows us to perform training on one dataset, testing on the other, as well as training on a combination of datasets. Our results suggest that there exist dataset biases in standard text-motion benchmarks such as HumanML3D, KIT Motion-Language, and BABEL. We show that text augmentations help close the domain gap to some extent, but the gap remains. We further provide the first zero-shot action recognition results on BABEL, without using categorical action labels during training, opening up a new avenue for future research.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. HumanTracker: Towards Comprehensive and Human-Aligned Motion Tracking Benchmark

    cs.RO 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    HumanTracker introduces a 153-hour categorized humanoid tracking benchmark and a preference-trained metric, HumanScore, that agrees with human judgments better than kinematic error metrics.

Pith tools