Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Long Context is Not Long at All: A Prospector of Long-Dependency Data for Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.17915 v1 pith:H736W5G2 submitted 2024-05-28 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords longdependencytrainingdependenciesllmslong-contextmodelingprolong
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Long-context modeling capabilities are important for large language models (LLMs) in various applications. However, directly training LLMs with long context windows is insufficient to enhance this capability since some training samples do not exhibit strong semantic dependencies across long contexts. In this study, we propose a data mining framework \textbf{ProLong} that can assign each training sample with a long dependency score, which can be used to rank and filter samples that are more advantageous for enhancing long-context modeling abilities in LLM training. Specifically, we first use delta perplexity scores to measure the \textit{Dependency Strength} between text segments in a given document. Then we refine this metric based on the \textit{Dependency Distance} of these segments to incorporate spatial relationships across long-contexts. Final results are calibrated with a \textit{Dependency Specificity} metric to prevent trivial dependencies introduced by repetitive patterns. Moreover, a random sampling approach is proposed to optimize the computational efficiency of ProLong. Comprehensive experiments on multiple benchmarks indicate that ProLong effectively identifies documents that carry long dependencies and LLMs trained on these documents exhibit significantly enhanced long-context modeling capabilities.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Can Large Language Models Match the Conclusions of Systematic Reviews?

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    On 284 medical questions derived from Cochrane systematic reviews, the best of 24 LLMs, DeepSeek V3, matches expert conclusions 62.40% of the time, and all tested models struggle with uncertain or low-quality evidence.

  2. Vibe Coding vs. Agentic Coding: Fundamentals and Practical Implications of Agentic AI

    cs.SE 2025-05 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A qualitative taxonomy positions vibe coding and agentic coding as complementary paradigms rather than rivals in AI-assisted software development.

  3. Structured Memory Mechanisms for Stable Context Representation in Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-05 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    A gated memory module with attention-based reading and forgetting is reported to improve NarrativeQA and dialogue consistency over GPT-2, BART, Longformer, and RETRO.

Pith tools