Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Jacob's ladders, logarithmic modification of the Hardy-Littlewood integral (1918), Titchmarsh's $\Omega$-theorem (1928) and new point of contact with the Fermat-Wiles theorem

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.02278 v1 pith:AXUEA7G7 submitted 2024-06-04 math.NT

classification math.NT
keywords hardy-littlewoodintegralmodificationtheoremcontactfermat-wilesjacobladders
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper we obtain two new points of contact between Jacob's ladders and Fermat-Wiles theorem. They are generated by a logarithmic modification of the Hardy-Littlewood integral. Furthermore, we present a kind of asymptotic laws of conservation for a set of areas connected with above mentioned modification of the Hardy-Littlewood integral.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Jacob's ladders, $\zeta$-transformation of the Fourier orthogonal system (2014) and new infinite sets of $\zeta$-equivalents of the Fermat-Wiles theorem

    math.NT 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A zeta-weighted integral limit is shown to equal (x^n+y^n)/z^n exactly, making 'limit not equal 1' a verbatim restatement of Fermat's Last Theorem.

  2. Jacob's ladders and three new equivalents of the Fermat-Wiles theorem and an infinite set of these equivalents that are independent on the Jacob's ladders

    math.NT 2024-12 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    The paper restates Fermat's Last Theorem as the condition that certain normalized integral averages of Dirichlet series do not equal 1, but the restatement carries no new mathematical content.

Pith tools