REVIEW 2 cited by
Label-wise Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty Quantification
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
We present a novel approach to uncertainty quantification in classification tasks based on label-wise decomposition of uncertainty measures. This label-wise perspective allows uncertainty to be quantified at the individual class level, thereby improving cost-sensitive decision-making and helping understand the sources of uncertainty. Furthermore, it allows to define total, aleatoric, and epistemic uncertainty on the basis of non-categorical measures such as variance, going beyond common entropy-based measures. In particular, variance-based measures address some of the limitations associated with established methods that have recently been discussed in the literature. We show that our proposed measures adhere to a number of desirable properties. Through empirical evaluation on a variety of benchmark data sets -- including applications in the medical domain where accurate uncertainty quantification is crucial -- we establish the effectiveness of label-wise uncertainty quantification.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
An Axiomatic Assessment of Entropy- and Variance-based Uncertainty Quantification in Regression
The paper introduces regression-specific axioms for uncertainty measures and finds that entropy- and variance-based measures satisfy different axioms, but the entropy-based results rely on a false equality between mix...
-
Safe and Certifiable AI Systems: Concepts, Challenges, and Lessons Learned
The paper presents the TÜV AUSTRIA Trusted AI audit catalog, a statistical framework based on the Stochastic Application Domain Definition, minimum performance requirements, and independent-sample testing for certifyi...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.