Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Chain of Agents: Large Language Models Collaborating on Long-Context Tasks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.02818 v1 pith:ZGAITOWL submitted 2024-06-04 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords contextllmsinformationinputlanguagelong-contexttasksagent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Addressing the challenge of effectively processing long contexts has become a critical issue for Large Language Models (LLMs). Two common strategies have emerged: 1) reducing the input length, such as retrieving relevant chunks by Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), and 2) expanding the context window limit of LLMs. However, both strategies have drawbacks: input reduction has no guarantee of covering the part with needed information, while window extension struggles with focusing on the pertinent information for solving the task. To mitigate these limitations, we propose Chain-of-Agents (CoA), a novel framework that harnesses multi-agent collaboration through natural language to enable information aggregation and context reasoning across various LLMs over long-context tasks. CoA consists of multiple worker agents who sequentially communicate to handle different segmented portions of the text, followed by a manager agent who synthesizes these contributions into a coherent final output. CoA processes the entire input by interleaving reading and reasoning, and it mitigates long context focus issues by assigning each agent a short context. We perform comprehensive evaluation of CoA on a wide range of long-context tasks in question answering, summarization, and code completion, demonstrating significant improvements by up to 10% over strong baselines of RAG, Full-Context, and multi-agent LLMs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 9 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Is Progressive Disclosure All You Need for Long-Context Agents?

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Progressive disclosure is redundant for a strong agent reading one book, but decisive when an agent must navigate a 20-book library; one flat routing level beats deeper hierarchies.

  2. An Adversary-Resistant Multi-Agent LLM System via Credibility Scoring

    cs.MA 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A credibility-scoring framework for multi-agent LLM systems, learning agent trustworthiness on the fly and weighting outputs accordingly, improves accuracy under adversarial conditions in some benchmarks.

  3. Uncertainty-Aware GUI Agent: Adaptive Perception through Component Recommendation and Human-in-the-Loop Refinement

    cs.AI 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A GUI agent that trims UI input with a recommendation module and asks users when decisions are ambiguous reports state-of-the-art success rates, though the interaction module is not benchmarked.

  4. UiS-IAI@LiveRAG: Retrieval-Augmented Information Nugget-Based Generation of Responses

    cs.IR 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A nugget-based RAG pipeline with query rewriting and cluster-based summarization is applied to the LiveRAG challenge, where few rewrites plus the original query improve recall and larger document cutoffs hit diminishi...

Pith tools