REVIEW 3 cited by
ValueBench: Towards Comprehensively Evaluating Value Orientations and Understanding of Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) are transforming diverse fields and gaining increasing influence as human proxies. This development underscores the urgent need for evaluating value orientations and understanding of LLMs to ensure their responsible integration into public-facing applications. This work introduces ValueBench, the first comprehensive psychometric benchmark for evaluating value orientations and value understanding in LLMs. ValueBench collects data from 44 established psychometric inventories, encompassing 453 multifaceted value dimensions. We propose an evaluation pipeline grounded in realistic human-AI interactions to probe value orientations, along with novel tasks for evaluating value understanding in an open-ended value space. With extensive experiments conducted on six representative LLMs, we unveil their shared and distinctive value orientations and exhibit their ability to approximate expert conclusions in value-related extraction and generation tasks. ValueBench is openly accessible at https://github.com/Value4AI/ValueBench.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
ValueFlow: Measuring the Propagation of Value Perturbations in Multi-Agent LLM Systems
A perturbation-based framework measures how value opinions propagate through multi-agent LLM systems, revealing that susceptibility varies by value, model, and topology.
-
Value-Action Alignment in Large Language Models under Privacy-Prosocial Conflict
A new VAAR metric finds that only a subset of LLMs show the human pattern where privacy concerns lower data-sharing acceptance and prosocial attitudes raise it.
-
Interaction Protocol Shapes Moral Judgment in Multi-Agent Debate
In multi-agent debates over everyday moral dilemmas, GPT-4.1 almost never revises in simultaneous settings but conforms strongly in sequential settings, while Claude 3.7 and Gemini 2.0 Flash revise far more often.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.