Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Shoulders of Giants: A Look at the Degree and Utility of Openness in NLP Research

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.06021 v1 pith:CEGA5LPN submitted 2024-06-10 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords analysedartefactsdegreedifferentobserveopennesspubliclyresearch
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We analysed a sample of NLP research papers archived in ACL Anthology as an attempt to quantify the degree of openness and the benefit of such an open culture in the NLP community. We observe that papers published in different NLP venues show different patterns related to artefact reuse. We also note that more than 30% of the papers we analysed do not release their artefacts publicly, despite promising to do so. Further, we observe a wide language-wise disparity in publicly available NLP-related artefacts.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Unsupervised Bilingual Lexicon Induction for Low Resource Languages

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Combining CSCBLI, linear transformation, and the iterative VecMap framework yields the top lexicon-induction accuracy on English with Sinhala, Tamil, and Punjabi, but the gains are small and the reported scores come f...

Pith tools