Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

RS-Agent: Automating Remote Sensing Tasks through Intelligent Agent

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.07089 v4 pith:BX63RMEN submitted 2024-06-11 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords remotesensingrs-agentplanningintelligentknowledgetasktasks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent advances in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have shown promise for remote sensing tasks such as visual question answering and scene understanding. However, existing models remain limited to basic instruction-following and struggle with real-world scenarios that require multi-source data integration, fine-grained spatial reasoning, and domain expertise. To address this gap, we propose RS-Agent, a domain-adapted intelligent agent that connects user intent with professional remote sensing workflows through structured task planning and tool orchestration. RS-Agent consists of four components aligned with typical remote sensing workflows: a Central Controller for intent understanding and process planning, a dynamic toolkit for tool execution, a Solution Space for task-specific expert guidance, and a Knowledge Space for domain knowledge support. We further introduce Task-Aware Retrieval, which improves planning by identifying task types and retrieving expert-defined solutions, and DualRAG, a weighted dual-path retrieval-augmented generation method that enhances the relevance and completeness of retrieved knowledge. RS-Agent natively supports multiple imaging modalities, including optical and SAR imagery, and can automatically organize dedicated SAR processing tools into executable workflows. Experiments on 9 datasets and 18 remote sensing tasks show that RS-Agent significantly outperforms state-of-the-art MLLMs, achieving over 95% task planning accuracy and strong results in scene classification, object counting, and remote sensing visual question answering. These results demonstrate the value of combining LLM reasoning with remote sensing expertise for intelligent geospatial analysis.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Multimodal Large Language Models for Remote Sensing Image Understanding: Domain-Specific or General-Purpose?

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Under one zero-shot protocol, general-purpose MLLMs match or outperform remote-sensing-specific MLLMs on several RS benchmarks, while RS-MLLMs keep advantages in visual grounding, RS-VQA, and ultra-high-resolution und...

  2. OpenEarthAgent: A Unified Framework for Tool-Augmented Geospatial Agents

    cs.CV 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A 4B model fine-tuned on tool-augmented geospatial reasoning traces outperforms larger general-purpose models on executable GIS/spectral tool-use benchmarks and matches frontier models on trajectory fidelity.

  3. Forest-Chat: Adapting Vision-Language Agents for Interactive Forest Change Analysis

    cs.CV 2026-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    An LLM-orchestrated agent that combines a supervised MCI model with AnyChange and GPT-4o can detect and caption forest changes, but its zero-shot results depend on dataset-specific prompts and tuned thresholds.

  4. CangLing-KnowFlow: A Unified Knowledge-and-Flow-fused Agent for Comprehensive Remote Sensing Applications

    cs.AI 2025-12 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    CangLing-KnowFlow combines a procedural knowledge base, dynamic workflow repair, and memory to beat ReAct/Reflexion on remote-sensing workflow tasks, but the benchmark is drawn from the same tasks used to build its kn...

  5. Augmented Vision-Language Models: A Systematic Review

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A structured taxonomy of inference-time augmentation techniques that connect vision-language models to external symbolic systems, tools, and knowledge sources.

Pith tools