Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Personalized Pieces: Efficient Personalized Large Language Models through Collaborative Efforts

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.10471 v3 pith:OMU55EI4 submitted 2024-06-15 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords personalizedpeftper-pcspiecescollaborativeeffortsassemblecomputation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Personalized large language models (LLMs) aim to tailor interactions, content, and recommendations to individual user preferences. While parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) methods excel in performance and generalization, they are costly and limit communal benefits when used individually. To this end, we introduce Personalized Pieces (Per-Pcs), a framework that allows users to safely share and assemble personalized PEFT efficiently with collaborative efforts. Per-Pcs involves selecting sharers, breaking their PEFT into pieces, and training gates for each piece. These pieces are added to a pool, from which target users can select and assemble personalized PEFT using their history data. This approach preserves privacy and enables fine-grained user modeling without excessive storage and computation demands. Experimental results show Per-Pcs outperforms non-personalized and PEFT retrieval baselines, offering performance comparable to OPPU with significantly lower resource use across six tasks. Further analysis highlights Per-Pcs's robustness concerning sharer count and selection strategy, pieces sharing ratio, and scalability in computation time and storage space. Per-Pcs's modularity promotes safe sharing, making LLM personalization more efficient, effective, and widely accessible through collaborative efforts.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Personalised Explanations in Long-term Human-Robot Interactions

    cs.RO 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A two-stage LLM pipeline that first generates an explanation and then personalises it using a stored user knowledge memory reduces explanation length only when the user has related prior knowledge, in synthetic hospit...

  2. Modeling and Optimizing User Preferences in AI Copilots: A Comprehensive Survey and Taxonomy

    cs.AI 2025-05 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    AI copilot preference optimization is organized into a pre-, mid-, and post-interaction taxonomy, with a unified definition of AI copilots.

Pith tools