REVIEW 2 cited by
A Systematic Survey of Text Summarization: From Statistical Methods to Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Text summarization research has undergone several significant transformations with the advent of deep neural networks, pre-trained language models (PLMs), and recent large language models (LLMs). This survey thus provides a comprehensive review of the research progress and evolution in text summarization through the lens of these paradigm shifts. It is organized into two main parts: (1) a detailed overview of datasets, evaluation metrics, and summarization methods before the LLM era, encompassing traditional statistical methods, deep learning approaches, and PLM fine-tuning techniques, and (2) the first detailed examination of recent advancements in benchmarking, modeling, and evaluating summarization in the LLM era. By synthesizing existing literature and presenting a cohesive overview, this survey also discusses research trends, open challenges, and proposes promising research directions in summarization, aiming to guide researchers through the evolving landscape of summarization research.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
VA-Blueprint: Uncovering Building Blocks for Visual Analytics System Design
A semi-automated methodology and public knowledge base catalog the building blocks of 101 urban visual analytics systems, using GPT-4 for extraction with human-in-the-loop correction and expert validation.
-
Ask, Retrieve, Summarize: A Modular Pipeline for Scientific Literature Summarization
XSum, a question-generation plus editor RAG pipeline, produces survey-style summaries from multiple scientific papers and reports improved scores on the SurveySum benchmark.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.