REVIEW 2 cited by
CrAM: Credibility-Aware Attention Modification in LLMs for Combating Misinformation in RAG
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) can alleviate hallucinations of Large Language Models (LLMs) by referencing external documents. However, the misinformation in external documents may mislead LLMs' generation. To address this issue, we explore the task of "credibility-aware RAG", in which LLMs automatically adjust the influence of retrieved documents based on their credibility scores to counteract misinformation. To this end, we introduce a plug-and-play method named $\textbf{Cr}$edibility-aware $\textbf{A}$ttention $\textbf{M}$odification (CrAM). CrAM identifies influential attention heads in LLMs and adjusts their attention weights based on the credibility of the documents, thereby reducing the impact of low-credibility documents. Experiments on Natual Questions and TriviaQA using Llama2-13B, Llama3-8B, and Qwen1.5-7B show that CrAM improves the RAG performance of LLMs against misinformation pollution by over 20%, even surpassing supervised fine-tuning methods.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
GETReason: Enhancing Image Context Extraction through Hierarchical Multi-Agent Reasoning
A multi-agent vision-language framework that extracts event, time, and location from public event images, evaluated with a new soft metric on VLM-augmented datasets.
-
CrEst: Credibility Estimation for Contexts in LLMs via Weak Supervision
A label-free method that scores retrieved documents by their agreement with the majority in embedding space and uses those scores to filter context in LLM question answering.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.