Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Selected Languages are All You Need for Cross-lingual Truthfulness Transfer

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.14434 v3 pith:HQBXV3LR submitted 2024-06-20 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords truthfulnessmultilingualtransfercross-linguallanguagesfamsslanguagellms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Truthfulness stands out as an essential challenge for Large Language Models (LLMs). Although many works have developed various ways for truthfulness enhancement, they seldom focus on truthfulness in multilingual scenarios. Meanwhile, contemporary multilingual aligning technologies struggle to balance numerous languages and often exhibit serious truthfulness gaps across different languages, especially those that differ greatly from English. In our work, we extend truthfulness evaluation to multilingual contexts and propose a practical method for cross-lingual truthfulness transfer called Fact-aware Multilingual Selective Synergy (FaMSS). FaMSS is able to select an optimal subset of all tested languages by language bias and transfer contributions, and then employ translation instruction tuning for cross-lingual truthfulness transfer. Experimental results demonstrate that our approach can effectively reduce the multilingual representation disparity and boost cross-lingual truthfulness transfer of LLMs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Paths Not Taken: Understanding and Mending the Multilingual Factual Recall Pipeline

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLMs recall facts through an English-centric internal path and then translate the answer; injecting a translation vector and a recall vector raises accuracy by over 35 percentage points in the weakest language.

Pith tools