REVIEW 2 cited by
Factual Dialogue Summarization via Learning from Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Factual consistency is an important quality in dialogue summarization. Large language model (LLM)-based automatic text summarization models generate more factually consistent summaries compared to those by smaller pretrained language models, but they face deployment challenges in real-world applications due to privacy or resource constraints. In this paper, we investigate the use of symbolic knowledge distillation to improve the factual consistency of smaller pretrained models for dialogue summarization. We employ zero-shot learning to extract symbolic knowledge from LLMs, generating both factually consistent (positive) and inconsistent (negative) summaries. We then apply two contrastive learning objectives on these summaries to enhance smaller summarization models. Experiments with BART, PEGASUS, and Flan-T5 indicate that our approach surpasses strong baselines that rely on complex data augmentation strategies. Our approach achieves better factual consistency while maintaining coherence, fluency, and relevance, as confirmed by various automatic evaluation metrics. We also provide access to the data and code to facilitate future research.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
ArgCMV: An Argument Summarization Benchmark for the LLM-era
ArgCMV is a new LLM-curated benchmark of about 12,000 arguments from r/ChangeMyView, and current key point extraction methods transfer poorly to it.
-
Multi-Party Conversational Agents: A Survey
A survey of multi-party conversational AI that organizes tasks into state-of-mind modeling, semantic understanding, and action modeling, and argues that theory of mind is the key missing ingredient.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.