Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

To Err is Robotic: Rapid Value-Based Trial-and-Error during Deployment

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.15917 v1 pith:JEZH6XTW submitted 2024-06-22 cs.RO

classification cs.RO
keywords robotbasepoliciesprogressdiversepolicyratestrategy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

When faced with a novel scenario, it can be hard to succeed on the first attempt. In these challenging situations, it is important to know how to retry quickly and meaningfully. Retrying behavior can emerge naturally in robots trained on diverse data, but such robot policies will typically only exhibit undirected retrying behavior and may not terminate a suboptimal approach before an unrecoverable mistake. We can improve these robot policies by instilling an explicit ability to try, evaluate, and retry a diverse range of strategies. We introduce Bellman-Guided Retrials, an algorithm that works on top of a base robot policy by monitoring the robot's progress, detecting when a change of plan is needed, and adapting the executed strategy until the robot succeeds. We start with a base policy trained on expert demonstrations of a variety of scenarios. Then, using the same expert demonstrations, we train a value function to estimate task completion. During test time, we use the value function to compare our expected rate of progress to our achieved rate of progress. If our current strategy fails to make progress at a reasonable rate, we recover the robot and sample a new strategy from the base policy while skewing it away from behaviors that have recently failed. We evaluate our method on simulated and real-world environments that contain a diverse suite of scenarios. We find that Bellman-Guided Retrials increases the average absolute success rates of base policies by more than 20% in simulation and 50% in real-world experiments, demonstrating a promising framework for instilling existing trained policies with explicit trial and error capabilities. For evaluation videos and other documentation, go to https://sites.google.com/view/to-err-robotic/home

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. CycleVLA: Proactive Self-Correcting Vision-Language-Action Models via Subtask Backtracking and Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding

    cs.RO 2026-01 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    CycleVLA adds progress-triggered VLM failure checks, subtask backtracking, and MBR consensus decoding to VLAs, raising LIBERO average success from 89.3% to 95.3% and claiming 91% real-robot success.

Pith tools