Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Towards Comprehensive Preference Data Collection for Reward Modeling

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.16486 v1 pith:XZXLXPGQ submitted 2024-06-24 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords datacollectionpreferencehumancollectedcomprehensiverewardensures
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) facilitates the alignment of large language models (LLMs) with human preferences, thereby enhancing the quality of responses generated. A critical component of RLHF is the reward model, which is trained on preference data and outputs a scalar reward during the inference stage. However, the collection of preference data still lacks thorough investigation. Recent studies indicate that preference data is collected either by AI or humans, where chosen and rejected instances are identified among pairwise responses. We question whether this process effectively filters out noise and ensures sufficient diversity in collected data. To address these concerns, for the first time, we propose a comprehensive framework for preference data collection, decomposing the process into four incremental steps: Prompt Generation, Response Generation, Response Filtering, and Human Labeling. This structured approach ensures the collection of high-quality preferences while reducing reliance on human labor. We conducted comprehensive experiments based on the data collected at different stages, demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed data collection method.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Clear Preferences Leave Traces: Reference Model-Guided Sampling for Preference Learning

    cs.LG 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Filtering DPO training data by the absolute length-normalized reference model log-probability gap between preferred and rejected responses improves MT-Bench scores with 30-50% of the data.

Pith tools