Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Evaluating and Benchmarking Foundation Models for Earth Observation and Geospatial AI

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.18295 v1 pith:FAHOENW3 submitted 2024-06-26 cs.CV cs.LG

classification cs.CVcs.LG
keywords modelsfoundationperformanceproblemsapplicationbenchmarkbenchmarkingearth
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

When we are primarily interested in solving several problems jointly with a given prescribed high performance accuracy for each target application, then Foundation Models should for most cases be used rather than problem-specific models. We focus on the specific Computer Vision application of Foundation Models for Earth Observation (EO) and geospatial AI. These models can solve important problems we are tackling, including for example land cover classification, crop type mapping, flood segmentation, building density estimation, and road regression segmentation. In this paper, we show that for a limited number of labelled data, Foundation Models achieve improved performance compared to problem-specific models. In this work, we also present our proposed evaluation benchmark for Foundation Models for EO. Benchmarking the generalization performance of Foundation Models is important as it has become difficult to standardize a fair comparison across the many different models that have been proposed recently. We present the results using our evaluation benchmark for EO Foundation Models and show that Foundation Models are label efficient in the downstream tasks and help us solve problems we are tackling in EO and remote sensing.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. High-Resolution Live Fuel Moisture Content (LFMC) Maps for Wildfire Risk from Multimodal Earth Observation Data

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Fine-tuning the pretrained Galileo model on the Globe-LFMC dataset yields 10 m wall-to-wall live fuel moisture maps with RMSE 18.91, about 20% better than a randomly initialized model.

  2. Geospatial Foundation Models to Enable Progress on Sustainable Development Goals

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A benchmark of 16 satellite-imaging tasks mapped to the UN Sustainable Development Goals shows geospatial foundation models often beat scratch-trained networks, though not always, and that energy use should be part of...

Pith tools