Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Capturing Minds, Not Just Words: Enhancing Role-Playing Language Models with Personality-Indicative Data

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.18921 v3 pith:JRJIQI3N submitted 2024-06-27 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords role-playingdatalanguagemindsmodelsrplmsadvancedcapturing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Role-playing agents (RPA) have been a popular application area for large language models (LLMs), attracting significant interest from both industry and academia.While existing RPAs well portray the characters' knowledge and tones, they face challenges in capturing their minds, especially for small role-playing language models (RPLMs). In this paper, we propose to enhance RPLMs via personality-indicative data. Specifically, we leverage questions from psychological scales and distill advanced RPAs to generate dialogues that grasp the minds of characters. Experimental results validate that RPLMs trained with our dataset exhibit advanced role-playing capabilities for both general and personality-related evaluations. Code and data are available at \href{https://github.com/alienet1109/RolePersonality}{this URL}.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Can LLM "Self-report"?: Evaluating the Validity of Self-report Scales in Measuring Personality Design in LLM-based Chatbots

    cs.HC 2024-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Chatbot self-report personality scores correlate only weakly with human-perceived personality and interaction quality across 500 GPT-4o chatbots, undermining the validity of self-report scales in this context.

  2. AI Agent Behavioral Science

    q-bio.NC 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    AI agents should be studied as behavioral entities shaped by context and interaction, not only as trained models.

Pith tools