Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

CRAB: Cross-environment Agent Benchmark for Multimodal Language Model Agents

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.01511 v4 pith:RKPT3BUF submitted 2024-07-01 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords crabagenttasksagentsbenchmarkenvironmentsframeworklanguage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The development of autonomous agents increasingly relies on Multimodal Language Models (MLMs) to perform tasks described in natural language with GUI environments, such as websites, desktop computers, or mobile phones. Existing benchmarks for MLM agents in interactive environments are limited by their focus on a single environment, lack of detailed and generalized evaluation methods, and the complexities of constructing tasks and evaluators. To overcome these limitations, we introduce Crab, the first agent benchmark framework designed to support cross-environment tasks, incorporating a graph-based fine-grained evaluation method and an efficient mechanism for task and evaluator construction. Our framework supports multiple devices and can be easily extended to any environment with a Python interface. Leveraging Crab, we developed a cross-platform Crab Benchmark-v0 comprising 120 tasks in computer desktop and mobile phone environments. We evaluated four advanced MLMs using different single and multi-agent system configurations on this benchmark. The experimental results demonstrate that the single agent with GPT-4o achieves the best completion ratio of 38.01%. All framework code, agent code, and task datasets are publicly available at https://github.com/camel-ai/crab.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. What Limits Virtual Agent Application? OmniBench: A Scalable Multi-Dimensional Benchmark for Essential Virtual Agent Capabilities

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A self-generating graph benchmark produces 36k GUI agent tasks with controllable complexity and ten capability scores, and fine-tuning on its trajectories gives small gains on AndroidControl and OmniAct.

  2. ZeroGUI: Automating Online GUI Learning at Zero Human Cost

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ZeroGUI uses VLM-generated tasks and VLM-estimated rewards with two-stage GRPO to improve GUI agent success rates on OSWorld and AndroidLab without human annotations.

  3. Cybernaut: Towards Reliable Web Automation

    cs.SE 2025-08 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A demonstration-to-SOP framework plus robust element identification and a trace similarity metric improves enterprise web automation success rates on an internal benchmark, with a fine-tuned consistency classifier rea...

Pith tools