Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Social Bias in Large Language Models For Bangla: An Empirical Study on Gender and Religious Bias

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.03536 v3 pith:344EPSOT submitted 2024-07-03 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords biasbanglabiaseslanguagedifferentllmssocialwork
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The rapid growth of Large Language Models (LLMs) has put forward the study of biases as a crucial field. It is important to assess the influence of different types of biases embedded in LLMs to ensure fair use in sensitive fields. Although there have been extensive works on bias assessment in English, such efforts are rare and scarce for a major language like Bangla. In this work, we examine two types of social biases in LLM generated outputs for Bangla language. Our main contributions in this work are: (1) bias studies on two different social biases for Bangla, (2) a curated dataset for bias measurement benchmarking and (3) testing two different probing techniques for bias detection in the context of Bangla. This is the first work of such kind involving bias assessment of LLMs for Bangla to the best of our knowledge. All our code and resources are publicly available for the progress of bias related research in Bangla NLP.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Demographic Prompting at Scale: When More Attributes Hurt LLM--Human Agreement

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

    Across five subjective tasks and five open-source LLMs, demographic prompting improves human agreement only for 1–3 high-signal, directionally coherent attributes and degrades under the full attribute set.

  2. Mind the Language Gap: Automated and Augmented Evaluation of Bias in LLMs for High- and Low-Resource Languages

    cs.CL 2025-04 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    LLM-based translation and paraphrasing can effectively augment multilingual bias testing, and low-resource languages tend to show worse bias-detection scores than high-resource ones.

Pith tools