REVIEW 1 cited by
Vision Mamba for Classification of Breast Ultrasound Images
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Mamba-based models, VMamba and Vim, are a recent family of vision encoders that offer promising performance improvements in many computer vision tasks. This paper compares Mamba-based models with traditional Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Vision Transformers (ViTs) using the breast ultrasound BUSI dataset and Breast Ultrasound B dataset. Our evaluation, which includes multiple runs of experiments and statistical significance analysis, demonstrates that some of the Mamba-based architectures often outperform CNN and ViT models with statistically significant results. For example, in the B dataset, the best Mamba-based models have a 1.98\% average AUC and a 5.0\% average Accuracy improvement compared to the best non-Mamba-based model in this study. These Mamba-based models effectively capture long-range dependencies while maintaining some inductive biases, making them suitable for applications with limited data. The code is available at \url{https://github.com/anasiri/BU-Mamba}
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
ControlMambaIR: Conditional Controls with State-Space Model for Image Restoration
A diffusion image restoration model with a Mamba condition network reports low LPIPS/FID on several benchmarks, but the PSNR losses and internal inconsistencies undermine the stated performance claims.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.