REVIEW 3 cited by
Data, Data Everywhere: A Guide for Pretraining Dataset Construction
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The impressive capabilities of recent language models can be largely attributed to the multi-trillion token pretraining datasets that they are trained on. However, model developers fail to disclose their construction methodology which has lead to a lack of open information on how to develop effective pretraining sets. To address this issue, we perform the first systematic study across the entire pipeline of pretraining set construction. First, we run ablations on existing techniques for pretraining set development to identify which methods translate to the largest gains in model accuracy on downstream evaluations. Then, we categorize the most widely used data source, web crawl snapshots, across the attributes of toxicity, quality, type of speech, and domain. Finally, we show how such attribute information can be used to further refine and improve the quality of a pretraining set. These findings constitute an actionable set of steps that practitioners can use to develop high quality pretraining sets.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
SuperWriter: Reflection-Driven Long-Form Generation with Large Language Models
A 7B writing model trained on plan-write-refine thinking data with multi-stage preference optimization matches or beats several larger models on long-form generation benchmarks.
-
Chameleon: A Flexible Data-mixing Framework for Language Model Pretraining and Finetuning
Chameleon uses kernel ridge leverage scores on domain embeddings to set LLM training-mixture weights, matching DoGE-level pretraining quality at roughly one fifth the compute and improving finetuning perplexity.
-
Using Scaling Laws for Data Source Utility Estimation in Domain-Specific Pre-Training
Running multiple short annealing runs at different token scales can reveal per-source utility scaling curves that change data-source rankings compared with single point estimates.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.