REVIEW 2 cited by
Induction Heads as an Essential Mechanism for Pattern Matching in In-context Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have shown a remarkable ability to learn and perform complex tasks through in-context learning (ICL). However, a comprehensive understanding of its internal mechanisms is still lacking. This paper explores the role of induction heads in a few-shot ICL setting. We analyse two state-of-the-art models, Llama-3-8B and InternLM2-20B on abstract pattern recognition and NLP tasks. Our results show that even a minimal ablation of induction heads leads to ICL performance decreases of up to ~32% for abstract pattern recognition tasks, bringing the performance close to random. For NLP tasks, this ablation substantially decreases the model's ability to benefit from examples, bringing few-shot ICL performance close to that of zero-shot prompts. We further use attention knockout to disable specific induction patterns, and present fine-grained evidence for the role that the induction mechanism plays in ICL.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Beyond Induction Heads: In-Context Meta Learning Induces Multi-Phase Circuit Emergence
A two-layer transformer solving an in-context meta-learning task acquires skill in three abrupt phases, each corresponding to a distinct attention circuit: bigram, label attention, then chunking plus label attention.
-
Emergence of Episodic Memory in Transformers: Characterizing Changes in Temporal Structure of Attention Scores During Training
Attention heads in trained GPT-2 models develop temporal contiguity, recency, and primacy effects, and ablating induction heads removes the resulting serial-recall bias in outputs.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.