Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Reevaluation of Large Neighborhood Search for MAPF: Findings and Opportunities

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.09451 v2 pith:7FOZVNJX submitted 2024-07-12 cs.RO

classification cs.RO
keywords methodsevaluationneighborhoodlearningmapfagentsextensivelack
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Multi-Agent Path Finding (MAPF) aims to arrange collision-free goal-reaching paths for a group of agents. Anytime MAPF solvers based on large neighborhood search (LNS) have gained prominence recently due to their flexibility and scalability, leading to a surge of methods, especially those leveraging machine learning, to enhance neighborhood selection. However, several pitfalls exist and hinder a comprehensive evaluation of these new methods, which mainly include: 1) Lower than actual or incorrect baseline performance; 2) Lack of a unified evaluation setting and criterion; 3) Lack of a codebase or executable model for supervised learning methods. To address these challenges, we introduce a unified evaluation framework, implement prior methods, and conduct an extensive comparison of prominent methods. Our evaluation reveals that rule-based heuristics serve as strong baselines, while current learning-based methods show no clear advantage on time efficiency or improvement capacity. Our extensive analysis also opens up new research opportunities for improving MAPF-LNS, such as targeting high-delayed agents, applying contextual algorithms, optimizing replan order and neighborhood size, where machine learning can potentially be integrated. Code and data are available at https://github.com/ChristinaTan0704/mapf-lns-unified.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Where Paths Collide: A Comprehensive Survey of Classic and Learning-Based Multi-Agent Pathfinding

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A broad survey of MAPF methods that documents inconsistent evaluation practices and proposes a unified taxonomy.

Pith tools