REVIEW 3 cited by
CharED: Character-wise Ensemble Decoding for Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable potential for problem solving, with open source models achieving increasingly impressive performance on benchmarks measuring areas from logical reasoning to mathematical ability. Ensembling models can further improve capabilities across a variety of domains. However, conventional methods of combining models at inference time such as shallow fusion necessitate a shared vocabulary and tokenization, and alternatives like fine-tuning for domain-specific performance are both time consuming and computationally expensive. We therefore present an inference-time ensembling algorithm aimed at "averaging" outputs from multiple LLMs and illustrate its improved performance across multiple domains compared to its constituent models alone. Character-wise ensemble decoding, CharED, finds the marginal distribution of each character for an individual model and performs a weighted average to generate an output, character by character. In coding, math, and toxicity benchmarks, we find our proposed model able to combine complimentary strengths of multiple LLMs, regardless of vocabulary, tokenization, or model size.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Inference-Time Consensus for Mitigating Hidden Behaviors from LLM Fine-Tuning
Token-wise minimum and base-relative consensus over per-source fine-tunes suppress hidden and explicit poisoning that union training and weight averaging retain.
-
An Annotated Reading of 'The Singer of Tales' in the LLM Era
LLM generation resembles oral-formulaic composition: single-pass, pattern-based, and non-authorial, so AI output should be treated as a new post-literate medium.
-
Speculate, then Collaborate: Fusing Knowledge of Language Models during Decoding
CoSD fuses two LLMs at decoding time: it keeps the draft model's tokens unless a confidence rule or a decision tree over token probabilities says the assistant model's token is better.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.