Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

MINI-LLM: Memory-Efficient Structured Pruning for Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.11681 v1 pith:NS2EEQJX submitted 2024-07-16 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords pruningllmsgradientsmini-llmgradient-freememorymodelscompressing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

As Large Language Models (LLMs) grow dramatically in size, there is an increasing trend in compressing and speeding up these models. Previous studies have highlighted the usefulness of gradients for importance scoring in neural network compressing, especially in pruning medium-size networks. However, the substantial memory requirements involved in calculating gradients with backpropagation impede the utilization of gradients in guiding LLM pruning. As a result, most pruning strategies for LLMs rely on gradient-free criteria, such as weight magnitudes or a mix of magnitudes and activations. In this paper, we devise a hybrid pruning criterion, which appropriately integrates magnitude, activation, and gradient to capitalize on feature map sensitivity for pruning LLMs. To overcome memory requirement barriers, we estimate gradients using only forward passes. Based on this, we propose a Memory-effIcieNt structured prunIng procedure for LLMs (MINI-LLM) to remove no-critical channels and multi-attention heads. Experimental results demonstrate the superior performance of MINI-LLM over existing gradient-free methods on three LLMs: LLaMA, BLOOM, and OPT across various downstream tasks (classification, multiple-choice, and generation), while MINI-LLM maintains a GPU memory footprint akin to gradient-free methods.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Lightweight Safety Classification Using Pruned Language Models

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Intermediate-layer features of small LLMs plus a penalized logistic regression classifier achieve high F1 scores on content safety and prompt injection classification with very few labeled examples, per the paper's ex...

  2. A Survey on Autonomy-Induced Security Risks in Large Model-Based Agents

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper surveys security risks of LLM agents, organizes them into a five-level autonomy taxonomy, and proposes an untested CMDP-based architecture called R2A2.

  3. Adaptive Pruning for Large Language Models with Structural Importance Awareness

    cs.CL 2024-12 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    SAAP scores LLM structures with a weighted fusion of two importance measures, prunes the most volatile units, and recovers performance with grouped quantized low-rank fine-tuning.

  4. A Survey: Towards Privacy and Security in Mobile Large Language Models

    cs.CR 2025-09 conditional

    A survey of privacy and security challenges for mobile large language models, summarizing known attack types and defenses without introducing new results.

Pith tools