Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Educational Personalized Learning Path Planning with Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.11773 v1 pith:D5RAQ6QY submitted 2024-07-16 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords learningpersonalizedengineeringllmsmethodplpppromptapproach
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Educational Personalized Learning Path Planning (PLPP) aims to tailor learning experiences to individual learners' needs, enhancing learning efficiency and engagement. Despite its potential, traditional PLPP systems often lack adaptability, interactivity, and transparency. This paper proposes a novel approach integrating Large Language Models (LLMs) with prompt engineering to address these challenges. By designing prompts that incorporate learner-specific information, our method guides LLMs like LLama-2-70B and GPT-4 to generate personalized, coherent, and pedagogically sound learning paths. We conducted experiments comparing our method with a baseline approach across various metrics, including accuracy, user satisfaction, and the quality of learning paths. The results show significant improvements in all areas, particularly with GPT-4, demonstrating the effectiveness of prompt engineering in enhancing PLPP. Additional long-term impact analysis further validates our method's potential to improve learner performance and retention. This research highlights the promise of LLMs and prompt engineering in advancing personalized education.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Automated scoring of the Ambiguous Intentions Hostility Questionnaire using fine-tuned large language models

    cs.CL 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    Fine-tuned LLMs align with human ratings when scoring AIHQ open-ended responses, across scenario types and in an independent dataset.

  2. Enhancing Learning Path Recommendation via Multi-task Learning

    cs.IR 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A multi-task LSTM that jointly predicts the next learning items and the learner's performance beats six baseline sequence models on ASSIST09.

  3. Towards Trustworthy Retrieval Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Survey

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey organizes current research on trustworthy RAG into six pillars, reliability, privacy, safety, fairness, explainability, and accountability, and maps methods, metrics, and open problems for each.

  4. Towards Transparent AI: A Survey on Explainable Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A review that groups LLM explainability methods by transformer architecture and discusses their evaluation and applications.

Pith tools