Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Understanding the Relationship between Prompts and Response Uncertainty in Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.14845 v3 pith:QUI3ALPV submitted 2024-07-20 cs.LG cs.CL

classification cs.LGcs.CL
keywords llmsuncertaintylanguagelargemodelmodelspromptprompts
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) are widely used in decision-making, but their reliability, especially in critical tasks like healthcare, is not well-established. Therefore, understanding how LLMs reason and make decisions is crucial for their safe deployment. This paper investigates how the uncertainty of responses generated by LLMs relates to the information provided in the input prompt. Leveraging the insight that LLMs learn to infer latent concepts during pretraining, we propose a prompt-response concept model that explains how LLMs generate responses and helps understand the relationship between prompts and response uncertainty. We show that the uncertainty decreases as the prompt's informativeness increases, similar to epistemic uncertainty. Our detailed experimental results on real-world datasets validate our proposed model.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 3 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Multimodal LLM Augmented Reasoning for Interpretable Visual Perception Analysis

    cs.HC 2025-04 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A multimodal LLM's pairwise judgments on visual clutter and Gestalt simplicity correlate most strongly with human visual complexity ratings across the SAVOIAS and IC9600 datasets.

Pith tools