REVIEW 3 cited by
A deeper look at depth pruning of LLMs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) are not only resource-intensive to train but even more costly to deploy in production. Therefore, recent work has attempted to prune blocks of LLMs based on cheap proxies for estimating block importance, effectively removing 10% of blocks in well-trained LLaMa-2 and Mistral 7b models without any significant degradation of downstream metrics. In this paper, we explore different block importance metrics by considering adaptive metrics such as Shapley value in addition to static ones explored in prior work. We show that adaptive metrics exhibit a trade-off in performance between tasks i.e., improvement on one task may degrade performance on the other due to differences in the computed block influences. Furthermore, we extend this analysis from a complete block to individual self-attention and feed-forward layers, highlighting the propensity of the self-attention layers to be more amendable to pruning, even allowing removal of upto 33% of the self-attention layers without incurring any performance degradation on MMLU for Mistral 7b (significant reduction in costly maintenance of KV-cache). Finally, we look at simple performance recovery techniques to emulate the pruned layers by training lightweight additive bias or low-rank linear adapters. Performance recovery using emulated updates avoids performance degradation for the initial blocks (up to 5% absolute improvement on MMLU), which is either competitive or superior to the learning-based technique.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
When Fewer Layers Break More Chains: Layer Pruning Harms Test-Time Scaling in LLMs
Removing just one or two layers from a reasoning-tuned LLM destroys its test-time scaling, and neither LoRA nor full fine-tuning restores it.
-
OrthoRank: Token Selection via Sink Token Orthogonality for Efficient LLM inference
OrthoRank selects tokens for computation by their orthogonality to the sink token in normalized hidden states, yielding better perplexity and accuracy than layer pruning at matched sparsity without additional training.
-
SkipGPT: Dynamic Layer Pruning Reinvented with Token Awareness and Module Decoupling
SkipGPT learns per-token, per-module routers that dynamically skip attention and MLP blocks, then uses LoRA to recover most of the original model's quality.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.