Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

SaulLM-54B & SaulLM-141B: Scaling Up Domain Adaptation for the Legal Domain

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.19584 v1 pith:WRERGC4P submitted 2024-07-28 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords legalmodelsadaptationdomainsaullm-141bsaullm-54bbillionbase
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper, we introduce SaulLM-54B and SaulLM-141B, two large language models (LLMs) tailored for the legal sector. These models, which feature architectures of 54 billion and 141 billion parameters, respectively, are based on the Mixtral architecture. The development of SaulLM-54B and SaulLM-141B is guided by large-scale domain adaptation, divided into three strategies: (1) the exploitation of continued pretraining involving a base corpus that includes over 540 billion of legal tokens, (2) the implementation of a specialized legal instruction-following protocol, and (3) the alignment of model outputs with human preferences in legal interpretations. The integration of synthetically generated data in the second and third steps enhances the models' capabilities in interpreting and processing legal texts, effectively reaching state-of-the-art performance and outperforming previous open-source models on LegalBench-Instruct. This work explores the trade-offs involved in domain-specific adaptation at this scale, offering insights that may inform future studies on domain adaptation using strong decoder models. Building upon SaulLM-7B, this study refines the approach to produce an LLM better equipped for legal tasks. We are releasing base, instruct, and aligned versions on top of SaulLM-54B and SaulLM-141B under the MIT License to facilitate reuse and collaborative research.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Automatic Legal Writing Evaluation of LLMs

    cs.CL 2025-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    oab-bench provides 105 graded Brazilian Bar Exam writing questions and an LLM-judge pipeline; Claude 3.5 Sonnet scores highest under the o1 judge, but judge-human agreement is validated on only three approved exams.

  2. Domain Adaptation of Foundation LLMs for e-Commerce

    cs.CL 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Continued pretraining Llama 3.1 on 1 trillion e-commerce tokens produces e-Llama 8B/70B models that improve in-house e-commerce benchmarks by roughly 25-30% while retaining most general-domain accuracy.

  3. Continual Pre-Training is (not) What You Need in Domain Adaption

    cs.CL 2025-04 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Continued pre-training on Taiwanese legal text plus instruction tuning did not consistently improve legal reasoning over base models or LoRA routes, and DPO and ORPO alignment degraded accuracy.

  4. Legal Evalutions and Challenges of Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2024-11 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    In a small human-scored evaluation of 10 LLMs on 26 legal cases, o1-preview received the highest overall human score (3.96/5), while ROUGE and BLEU scores did not track human preference.

Pith tools