Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Re-TASK: Revisiting LLM Tasks from Capability, Skill, and Knowledge Perspectives

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.06904 v3 pith:ITXHLECO submitted 2024-08-13 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords re-tasktasksknowledgeskillcapabilitydomainsintroducesllms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The Chain-of-Thought (CoT) paradigm has become a pivotal method for solving complex problems with large language models (LLMs). However, its application to domain-specific tasks remains challenging, as LLMs often fail to decompose tasks accurately or execute subtasks effectively. This paper introduces the Re-TASK framework, a novel theoretical model that revisits LLM tasks from capability, skill, and knowledge perspectives, drawing on the principles of Bloom's Taxonomy and Knowledge Space Theory. While CoT provides a workflow-centric perspective on tasks, Re-TASK introduces a Chain-of-Learning (CoL) paradigm that highlights task dependencies on specific capability items, further broken down into their constituent knowledge and skill components. To address CoT failures, we propose a Re-TASK prompting strategy, which strengthens task-relevant capabilities through targeted knowledge injection and skill adaptation. Experiments across diverse domains demonstrate the effectiveness of Re-TASK. In particular, we achieve improvements of 45.00% on Yi-1.5-9B and 24.50% on Llama3-Chinese-8B for legal tasks. These results highlight the potential of Re-TASK to significantly enhance LLM performance and its applicability in specialized domains. We release our code and data at https://github.com/Uylee/Re-TASK.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. From Parameters to Prompts: Understanding and Mitigating the Factuality Gap between Fine-Tuned LLMs

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Fine-tuning LLMs on known versus unknown facts creates a factuality gap that in-context prompting can largely erase, according to experiments and a knowledge-graph model.

Pith tools