REVIEW 1 cited by
Overview of the BioLaySumm 2024 Shared Task on the Lay Summarization of Biomedical Research Articles
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
This paper presents the setup and results of the second edition of the BioLaySumm shared task on the Lay Summarisation of Biomedical Research Articles, hosted at the BioNLP Workshop at ACL 2024. In this task edition, we aim to build on the first edition's success by further increasing research interest in this important task and encouraging participants to explore novel approaches that will help advance the state-of-the-art. Encouragingly, we found research interest in the task to be high, with this edition of the task attracting a total of 53 participating teams, a significant increase in engagement from the previous edition. Overall, our results show that a broad range of innovative approaches were adopted by task participants, with a predictable shift towards the use of Large Language Models (LLMs).
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Are LLM-generated plain language summaries truly understandable? A large-scale crowdsourced evaluation
Human-written plain language summaries led to significantly better reader comprehension than LLM-generated ones, despite similar subjective ratings, and most automated metrics did not predict comprehension.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.