Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Externally Valid Selection of Experimental Sites via the k-Median Problem

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.09187 v2 pith:WII2FRIE submitted 2024-08-17 econ.EM

classification econ.EM
keywords problemequalexperimentk-mediansitesapplicationsapproximatelybaseline
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We present a decision-theoretic justification for viewing the question of how to best choose where to experiment in order to optimize external validity as a $k$-median problem, a popular problem in computer science and operations research. We present conditions under which minimizing the worst-case, welfare-based regret among all nonrandom schemes that select $k$ sites to experiment is approximately equal - and sometimes exactly equal - to finding the k most central vectors of baseline site-level covariates. The k-median problem can be formulated as a linear integer program. Two empirical applications illustrate the theoretical and computational benefits of the suggested procedure.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Learning What to Learn: Experimental Design when Combining Experimental with Observational Evidence

    econ.EM 2025-10 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Designing experiments that will be combined with observational evidence reduces to balancing a normalized variance regret against a normalized bias regret.

Pith tools