Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

On Learning Action Costs from Input Plans

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.10889 v3 pith:TMM2U3PU submitted 2024-08-20 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords planslearningactioncostsinputactionsallowslacfip
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Most of the work on learning action models focus on learning the actions' dynamics from input plans. This allows us to specify the valid plans of a planning task. However, very little work focuses on learning action costs, which in turn allows us to rank the different plans. In this paper we introduce a new problem: that of learning the costs of a set of actions such that a set of input plans are optimal under the resulting planning model. To solve this problem we present $LACFIP^k$, an algorithm to learn action's costs from unlabeled input plans. We provide theoretical and empirical results showing how $LACFIP^k$ can successfully solve this task.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. GenPlanX. Generation of Plans and Execution

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    GenPlanX couples an LLM-based natural-language to PDDL translation with a classical planner and an execution monitor to solve office automation tasks with plan guarantees.

Pith tools