Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Evolution of Detection Performance throughout the Online Lifespan of Synthetic Images

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.11541 v1 pith:EKQN354U submitted 2024-08-21 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords syntheticdetectorsonlinedetectionimagesperformanceimagelifespan
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Synthetic images disseminated online significantly differ from those used during the training and evaluation of the state-of-the-art detectors. In this work, we analyze the performance of synthetic image detectors as deceptive synthetic images evolve throughout their online lifespan. Our study reveals that, despite advancements in the field, current state-of-the-art detectors struggle to distinguish between synthetic and real images in the wild. Moreover, we show that the time elapsed since the initial online appearance of a synthetic image negatively affects the performance of most detectors. Ultimately, by employing a retrieval-assisted detection approach, we demonstrate the feasibility to maintain initial detection performance throughout the whole online lifespan of an image and enhance the average detection efficacy across several state-of-the-art detectors by 6.7% and 7.8% for balanced accuracy and AUC metrics, respectively.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Bridging the Gap Between Ideal and Real-world Evaluation: Benchmarking AI-Generated Image Detection in Challenging Scenarios

    cs.CV 2025-09 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    AI-generated image detectors lose substantial accuracy on images shared over social media or scanned/re-photographed, while humans improve quickly after seeing two examples.

Pith tools