Pith. sign in

REVIEW 10 cited by

BackdoorLLM: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Backdoor Attacks and Defenses on Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.12798 v2 pith:IDJGFBND submitted 2024-08-23 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords backdoorbackdoorllmllmsattackbenchmarkhttpsattackscomprehensive
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Generative large language models (LLMs) have achieved state-of-the-art results on a wide range of tasks, yet they remain susceptible to backdoor attacks: carefully crafted triggers in the input can manipulate the model to produce adversary-specified outputs. While prior research has predominantly focused on backdoor risks in vision and classification settings, the vulnerability of LLMs in open-ended text generation remains underexplored. To fill this gap, we introduce BackdoorLLM (Our BackdoorLLM benchmark was awarded First Prize in the SafetyBench competition, https://www.mlsafety.org/safebench/winners, organized by the Center for AI Safety, https://safe.ai/.), the first comprehensive benchmark for systematically evaluating backdoor threats in text-generation LLMs. BackdoorLLM provides: (i) a unified repository of benchmarks with a standardized training and evaluation pipeline; (ii) a diverse suite of attack modalities, including data poisoning, weight poisoning, hidden-state manipulation, and chain-of-thought hijacking; (iii) over 200 experiments spanning 8 distinct attack strategies, 7 real-world scenarios, and 6 model architectures; (iv) key insights into the factors that govern backdoor effectiveness and failure modes in LLMs; and (v) a defense toolkit encompassing 7 representative mitigation techniques. Our code and datasets are available at https://github.com/bboylyg/BackdoorLLM. We will continuously incorporate emerging attack and defense methodologies to support the research in advancing the safety and reliability of LLMs.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 10 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. PathMark: Protecting Intellectual Property of Mixture-of-Expert LLMs via Path Watermarks

    cs.CR 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    PathMark embeds multi-bit MoE ownership watermarks by steering triggered tokens onto predetermined expert subsets, verified by routing inspection or trigger-only outputs.

  2. Backdoor Attack on Vision Language Models with Stealthy Semantic Manipulation

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    BadSem shows that semantic mismatches between images and text can serve as stealthy backdoor triggers for VLMs, achieving near-perfect attack success with low poisoning rates.

  3. Hollow-LLM Attack: Computationally Trivial Weights in Zero-Knowledge Verification of LLM Inference

    cs.CR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ZK-verified LLM inference can be fooled: a provider can serve a small model while producing valid proofs for a much larger declared model by embedding structure-preserving ghost weights.

  4. Even More Deception: Objective Misalignment in Mixed-Motive LLM Multi-Agent Systems

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Changing one LLM agent's secret objective in Werewolf lowers its team's win rate and changes its reasoning, while its public chat stays deceptively normal.

  5. When Activation Oracles Learn Not to Read: Concept-Specific Blind Spots in Fine-Tuned Oracles

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Activation Oracles trained on Taboo subjects selectively fail to verbalize the concept present during their own training, even when that concept remains linearly decodable inside the oracle.

  6. Defense Against LLM Backdoors using Critical Neuron Isolation Pruning

    cs.CR 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A trigger-inversion plus activation-difference pruning pipeline removes LLM backdoors with ~0.1% neuron intervention and >95% relative ASR reduction.

  7. Backdoor Samples Detection Based on Perturbation Discrepancy Consistency in Pre-trained Language Models

    cs.CR 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Backdoor text samples show smaller log-probability changes under mask-filling perturbations than clean samples, which enables zero-shot backdoor detection without the poisoned model.

  8. Layer-Wise Perturbations via Sparse Autoencoders for Adversarial Text Generation

    cs.CL 2025-08 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Sparse autoencoder activation perturbation (SFPF) applied on top of existing jailbreak prompts raises attack success rate on Qwen3-32B, but with no defense evaluation and weak reproducibility.

  9. A Comprehensive Survey on Trustworthiness in Reasoning with Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A structured literature survey concluding that reasoning capabilities do not automatically make LLMs more trustworthy and can introduce new vulnerabilities in safety, robustness, and privacy.

  10. Architectural Backdoors in Deep Learning: A Survey of Vulnerabilities, Detection, and Defense

    cs.CR 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Architectural backdoors are a persistent class of neural-network backdoors that survive clean retraining, and current detection tools and benchmarks are not ready for them.

Pith tools