Response of interferometers to the vacuum of quantum gravity

Allic Sivaramakrishnan; Daniel Carney; Manthos Karydas

arxiv: 2409.03894 · v2 · submitted 2024-09-05 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc· hep-ph

Response of interferometers to the vacuum of quantum gravity

Daniel Carney , Manthos Karydas , Allic Sivaramakrishnan This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 21:15 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qchep-ph

keywords quantum gravityeffective field theoryinterferometersvacuum fluctuationsgravitonslength measurementPlanck length

0 comments

The pith

The effective quantum field theory of gravitons predicts only Planck-scale length variations in interferometers.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper calculates the effect of vacuum fluctuations in the standard low-energy description of quantum gravity on the length measured by an interferometer. It shows that these fluctuations produce a change in length of order the Planck length, which is far too small to observe. A reader would care because experiments are being constructed to hunt for larger signals that might reveal new physics. The calculation remains finite with no signs of breakdown at accessible energies, so a large observed effect would require physics outside this framework.

Core claim

In the usual effective quantum field theory of gravitons, the vacuum fluctuations lead to a variation in the measured interferometer length of ΔL ∼ ℓ_pl ∼ 10^{-35} m. There are no divergences that would indicate a breakdown of the calculation at low energies. Therefore, observation of a large gravitationally-induced length variation would signal a severe breakdown of effective quantum field theory in the low-energy regime of quantum gravity.

What carries the argument

The effective quantum field theory of gravitons, used to compute the contribution of vacuum fluctuations to the proper distance measured between interferometer mirrors.

If this is right

Any detectable signal from current or planned interferometer experiments would require physics beyond the standard effective theory.
The low-energy regime of quantum gravity remains well-described by the usual theory, with no divergences appearing in the length calculation.
Searches for large gravitationally induced length variations will return null results under the assumptions of effective field theory.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

This result sets a baseline expectation that any observed excess noise in such detectors must come from sources outside minimal quantum gravity.
It suggests that tests of quantum gravity via macroscopic interferometers will only be sensitive if the vacuum structure deviates from standard effective field theory.

Load-bearing premise

The standard effective quantum field theory of gravitons correctly captures all relevant low-energy quantum gravity effects on interferometer length measurements without additional contributions from unknown high-energy physics or modified vacuum structure.

What would settle it

Detection of a length variation much larger than the Planck length in an interferometer experiment targeting quantum gravity vacuum effects would falsify the prediction.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2409.03894 by Allic Sivaramakrishnan, Daniel Carney, Manthos Karydas.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Single-arm Fabry-Perot cavity as a gravitational wave [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. Strain noise power of quantum gravitational vac [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

It has recently been suggested that exotic quantum gravity effects could lead to large vacuum fluctuations, potentially observable with realistic detectors. Experiments are currently being built to search for these signals. Here we analyze the minimal model of quantum gravity at low energies -- the usual effective quantum field theory of gravitons -- and show that it unambiguously predicts an unobservably small variation in the measured interferometer length $\Delta L \sim \ell_{\rm pl} \sim 10^{-35}~{\rm m}$. In particular, there are no divergences signaling a breakdown of this calculation in the low energy regime. Thus, detection of a large, gravitationally-induced length variation would signal a severe breakdown of effective quantum field theory in low energy quantum gravity.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Standard graviton EFT gives a clean Planck-suppressed prediction for interferometer length fluctuations with no low-energy divergences.

read the letter

The main point is that this paper takes the usual effective field theory of gravitons and computes the vacuum-induced length variation in an interferometer, finding ΔL on the order of the Planck length with no divergences at accessible energies. This sets a baseline that any larger signal would require physics outside the EFT. The calculation uses standard perturbative methods for metric correlators and integrated observables, which aligns with the stress-test note that the claim is internally consistent. What the paper does well is make this explicit for the context of recent experimental proposals, showing the minimal model yields an unobservably small effect without fitting or new parameters. It directly contrasts with suggestions of large fluctuations, which is a useful reference point. Soft spots are minor and do not undermine the central result. The abstract asserts an unambiguous finite outcome, but the full steps for how vacuum fluctuations couple to the specific length observable are not visible here; if the derivation follows the usual gauge-invariant approach, this is not a problem. No circularity or invented entities appear. The work is for people designing or interpreting quantum gravity interferometer searches who need the standard EFT prediction spelled out. A reader focused on phenomenology will get value from the baseline it provides, even if the techniques themselves are not new. It deserves a serious referee because the result is grounded in established methods and addresses a timely experimental question without overclaiming. I would send it to peer review.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes the response of interferometers to vacuum fluctuations within the minimal low-energy model of quantum gravity, namely the effective field theory of perturbative gravitons. It derives that this framework unambiguously predicts an unobservably small length variation ΔL ∼ ℓ_pl ∼ 10^{-35} m with no divergences in the low-energy regime, implying that any larger gravitationally induced signal would require a breakdown of EFT.

Significance. If the central result holds, the work supplies a clear, parameter-free benchmark from standard perturbative methods for ongoing and planned interferometer searches for quantum-gravity effects. The calculation employs well-established techniques for metric correlators and integrated length observables without introducing new parameters or ad-hoc cutoffs, which strengthens its utility as a baseline for interpreting experimental outcomes.

minor comments (2)

[§3] §3: the explicit steps connecting the graviton two-point function to the variance of the integrated length observable would benefit from an additional intermediate equation showing the gauge-invariant combination used.
[Eq. (12)] The frequency integral in the expression for ΔL should state the infrared cutoff choice (or its absence) more explicitly to confirm independence from low-energy scales.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive summary, assessment of significance, and recommendation of minor revision. No major comments are listed in the report, so we have no specific points requiring point-by-point rebuttal or revision at this stage.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation uses external standard EFT

full rationale

The paper's central claim derives the interferometer length variation ΔL ∼ ℓ_pl directly from the established effective quantum field theory of gravitons, an external framework not fitted or defined within the paper itself. No load-bearing steps reduce by construction to self-citations, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or ansatzes smuggled via prior author work. The calculation of metric correlators and integrated observables follows standard perturbative QFT methods without internal redefinition of the target result. This is the most common honest finding for papers applying known EFT techniques to new observables.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the applicability of standard effective field theory for gravitons at low energies and the assumption that vacuum fluctuations translate directly to length variations in the interferometer without additional model-dependent effects.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Effective quantum field theory of gravitons is the minimal model of quantum gravity at low energies
Explicitly stated in the abstract as the framework used for the calculation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5651 in / 1251 out tokens · 23872 ms · 2026-05-23T21:15:32.000738+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Geometric noise spectrum in interferometers
hep-th 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 5.0

Computes UV-finite noise spectra in interferometers from graviton fluctuations in vacuum/thermal/squeezed states and from massless scalar vacuum stress-energy, all Planck-suppressed.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 9 internal anchors

[1]

Quantum interactions between a laser interferometer and gravitational waves

B. Pang and Y. Chen, “Quantum interactions between a laser interferometer and gravitational waves,” Phys. Rev. D 98 no. 12, (2018) 124006, arXiv:1808.09122 [quant-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[2]

The Noise of Gravitons,

M. Parikh, F. Wilczek, and G. Zahariade, “The Noise of Gravitons,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 29 no. 14, (2020) 2042001, arXiv:2005.07211 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2020
[3]

Bound on quantum fluctuations in gravitational waves from LIGO-Virgo,

M. P. Hertzberg and J. A. Litterer, “Bound on quantum fluctuations in gravitational waves from LIGO-Virgo,” JCAP 03 (2023) 009, arXiv:2112.12159 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023
[4]

Quantum signatures in nonlinear gravitational waves,

T. Guerreiro, F. Coradeschi, A. M. Frassino, J. R. West, and E. Schioppa, Junior., “Quantum signatures in nonlinear gravitational waves,” Quantum 6 (2022) 879, arXiv:2111.01779 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2022
[5]

Graviton detection and the quantization of gravity,

D. Carney, V. Domcke, and N. L. Rodd, “Graviton detection and the quantization of gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 109 no. 4, (2024) 044009, arXiv:2308.12988 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[6]

Advanced ligo,

J. Aasi et al., “Advanced ligo,” Classical and quantum gravity 32 no. 7, (2015) 074001

work page 2015
[7]

Aggarwalet al., Challenges and opportunities of gravitational-wave searches at MHz to GHz frequencies, Living Rev

N. Aggarwal et al., “Challenges and opportunities of gravitational-wave searches at MHz to GHz frequencies,” Living Rev. Rel. 24 no. 1, (2021) 4, arXiv:2011.12414 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2021
[8]

Searching for New Physics with a Levitated-Sensor-Based Gravitational-Wave Detector,

N. Aggarwal, G. P. Winstone, M. Teo, M. Baryakhtar, S. L. Larson, V. Kalogera, and A. A. Geraci, “Searching for New Physics with a Levitated-Sensor-Based Gravitational-Wave Detector,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 no. 11, (2022) 111101, arXiv:2010.13157 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2022
[9]

An experiment for observing quantum gravity phenomena using twin table-top 3d interferometers,

S. M. Vermeulen, L. Aiello, A. Ejlli, W. L. Griffiths, A. L. James, K. L. Dooley, and H. Grote, “An experiment for observing quantum gravity phenomena using twin table-top 3d interferometers,” Classical and Quantum Gravity 38 no. 8, (2021) 085008

work page 2021
[10]

Photon Counting Interferometry to Detect Geontropic Space-Time Fluctuations with GQuEST,

S. M. Vermeulen et al., “Photon Counting Interferometry to Detect Geontropic Space-Time Fluctuations with GQuEST,” arXiv:2404.07524 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv
[11]

Introduction to the Effective Field Theory Description of Gravity

J. F. Donoghue, “Introduction to the effective field theory description of gravity,” in Advanced School on Effective Theories. 6, 1995. arXiv:gr-qc/9512024

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995
[12]

Quantum Gravity in Everyday Life: General Relativity as an Effective Field Theory

C. P. Burgess, “Quantum gravity in everyday life: General relativity as an effective field theory,” Living Rev. Rel. 7 (2004) 5–56, arXiv:gr-qc/0311082

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004
[13]

J. F. Donoghue, Quantum General Relativity and Effective Field Theory. 2023. arXiv:2211.09902 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2023
[14]

Spacetime Indeterminacy and Holographic Noise

C. J. Hogan, “Spacetime Indeterminacy and Holographic Noise,” arXiv:0706.1999 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999
[15]

Measurement of quantum fluctuations in geometry,

C. J. Hogan, “Measurement of quantum fluctuations in geometry,” Physical Review D 77 no. 10, (2008) 104031

work page 2008
[16]

Observational signatures of quantum gravity in interferometers,

E. P. Verlinde and K. M. Zurek, “Observational signatures of quantum gravity in interferometers,” Phys. Lett. B 822 (2021) 136663, arXiv:1902.08207 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2021
[17]

On vacuum fluctuations in quantum gravity and interferometer arm fluctuations,

K. M. Zurek, “On vacuum fluctuations in quantum gravity and interferometer arm fluctuations,” Phys. Lett. B 826 (2022) 136910, arXiv:2012.05870 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2022
[18]

Interferometer response to geontropic fluctuations,

D. Li, V. S. H. Lee, Y. Chen, and K. M. Zurek, “Interferometer response to geontropic fluctuations,” Phys. Rev. D 107 no. 2, (2023) 024002, arXiv:2209.07543 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023
[19]

Quantum gravity background in next-generation gravitational wave detectors,

M. W. Bub, Y. Chen, Y. Du, D. Li, Y. Zhang, and K. M. Zurek, “Quantum gravity background in next-generation gravitational wave detectors,” Phys. Rev. D 108 no. 6, (2023) 064038, arXiv:2305.11224 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023
[20]

Photons and gravitons in s-matrix theory: derivation of charge conservation and equality of gravitational and inertial mass,

S. Weinberg, “Photons and gravitons in s-matrix theory: derivation of charge conservation and equality of gravitational and inertial mass,” Physical Review 135 no. 4B, (1964) B1049

work page 1964
[21]

Photons and gravitons in perturbation theory: Derivation of maxwell’s and einstein’s equations,

S. Weinberg, “Photons and gravitons in perturbation theory: Derivation of maxwell’s and einstein’s equations,” Physical Review 138 no. 4B, (1965) B988

work page 1965
[22]

The Large N Limit of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity

J. M. Maldacena, “The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 231–252, arXiv:hep-th/9711200

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998
[23]

Holography from Conformal Field Theory

I. Heemskerk, J. Penedones, J. Polchinski, and J. Sully, “Holography from Conformal Field Theory,” JHEP 10 (2009) 079, arXiv:0907.0151 [hep-th] . 6

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[24]

Gravitational Wave Detection with Atom Interferometry

S. Dimopoulos, P. W. Graham, J. M. Hogan, M. A. Kasevich, and S. Rajendran, “Gravitational Wave Detection with Atom Interferometry,” Phys. Lett. B 678 (2009) 37–40, arXiv:0712.1250 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[25]

Proper Time Observables of General Gravitational Perturbations in Laser Interferometry-based Gravitational Wave Detectors,

V. S. H. Lee and K. M. Zurek, “Proper Time Observables of General Gravitational Perturbations in Laser Interferometry-based Gravitational Wave Detectors,” arXiv:2408.03363 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[26]

Correlators of Worldline Proper Length,

A. Sivaramakrishnan, “Correlators of Worldline Proper Length,” arXiv:2406.17205 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[27]

Maggiore, Gravitational Waves

M. Maggiore, Gravitational Waves. Vol. 1: Theory and Experiments. Oxford University Press, 2007

work page 2007
[28]

Quantum measurements in fundamental physics: a user's manual

J. Beckey, D. Carney, and G. Marocco, “Quantum measurements in fundamental physics: a user’s manual,” arXiv:2311.07270 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[29]

Maggiore, Gravitational waves, vol

M. Maggiore, Gravitational waves, vol. 2. Oxford university press, 2008

work page 2008
[30]

Input and output in damped quantum systems: Quantum stochastic differential equations and the master equation,

C. W. Gardiner and M. J. Collett, “Input and output in damped quantum systems: Quantum stochastic differential equations and the master equation,” Physical Review A 31 no. 6, (1985) 3761

work page 1985
[31]

Ligo technical document ligo-t0900043

“Ligo technical document ligo-t0900043.” https://dcc.ligo.org/public/0000/T0900043/011/ LIGO-T0900043-11.pdf

work page
[32]

Causality Constraints in Conformal Field Theory

T. Hartman, S. Jain, and S. Kundu, “Causality Constraints in Conformal Field Theory,” JHEP 05 (2016) 099, arXiv:1509.00014 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[33]

N. D. Birrell and P. C. W. Davies, Quantum Fields in Curved Space. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 1982

work page 1982
[34]

Light-ray operators in conformal field theory,

P. Kravchuk and D. Simmons-Duffin, “Light-ray operators in conformal field theory,” JHEP 11 (2018) 102, arXiv:1805.00098 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2018
[35]

Introduction to quantum noise, measurement, and amplification,

A. A. Clerk, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, F. Marquardt, and R. J. Schoelkopf, “Introduction to quantum noise, measurement, and amplification,” Reviews of Modern Physics 82 no. 2, (2010) 1155–1208

work page 2010
[36]

Unification of thermal and quantum noises in gravitational-wave detectors,

C. Whittle, L. McCuller, V. Sudhir, and M. Evans, “Unification of thermal and quantum noises in gravitational-wave detectors,” Physical Review Letters 130 no. 24, (2023) 241401. 7 Appendix A: Geodesics and singularities Here we give a few more details in the geometric cal- culations of Sec. I, and in particular some discussion on the choice of iϵ prescrip...

work page 2023

[1] [1]

Quantum interactions between a laser interferometer and gravitational waves

B. Pang and Y. Chen, “Quantum interactions between a laser interferometer and gravitational waves,” Phys. Rev. D 98 no. 12, (2018) 124006, arXiv:1808.09122 [quant-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

[2] [2]

The Noise of Gravitons,

M. Parikh, F. Wilczek, and G. Zahariade, “The Noise of Gravitons,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 29 no. 14, (2020) 2042001, arXiv:2005.07211 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2020

[3] [3]

Bound on quantum fluctuations in gravitational waves from LIGO-Virgo,

M. P. Hertzberg and J. A. Litterer, “Bound on quantum fluctuations in gravitational waves from LIGO-Virgo,” JCAP 03 (2023) 009, arXiv:2112.12159 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023

[4] [4]

Quantum signatures in nonlinear gravitational waves,

T. Guerreiro, F. Coradeschi, A. M. Frassino, J. R. West, and E. Schioppa, Junior., “Quantum signatures in nonlinear gravitational waves,” Quantum 6 (2022) 879, arXiv:2111.01779 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2022

[5] [5]

Graviton detection and the quantization of gravity,

D. Carney, V. Domcke, and N. L. Rodd, “Graviton detection and the quantization of gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 109 no. 4, (2024) 044009, arXiv:2308.12988 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024

[6] [6]

Advanced ligo,

J. Aasi et al., “Advanced ligo,” Classical and quantum gravity 32 no. 7, (2015) 074001

work page 2015

[7] [7]

Aggarwalet al., Challenges and opportunities of gravitational-wave searches at MHz to GHz frequencies, Living Rev

N. Aggarwal et al., “Challenges and opportunities of gravitational-wave searches at MHz to GHz frequencies,” Living Rev. Rel. 24 no. 1, (2021) 4, arXiv:2011.12414 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2021

[8] [8]

Searching for New Physics with a Levitated-Sensor-Based Gravitational-Wave Detector,

N. Aggarwal, G. P. Winstone, M. Teo, M. Baryakhtar, S. L. Larson, V. Kalogera, and A. A. Geraci, “Searching for New Physics with a Levitated-Sensor-Based Gravitational-Wave Detector,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 no. 11, (2022) 111101, arXiv:2010.13157 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2022

[9] [9]

An experiment for observing quantum gravity phenomena using twin table-top 3d interferometers,

S. M. Vermeulen, L. Aiello, A. Ejlli, W. L. Griffiths, A. L. James, K. L. Dooley, and H. Grote, “An experiment for observing quantum gravity phenomena using twin table-top 3d interferometers,” Classical and Quantum Gravity 38 no. 8, (2021) 085008

work page 2021

[10] [10]

Photon Counting Interferometry to Detect Geontropic Space-Time Fluctuations with GQuEST,

S. M. Vermeulen et al., “Photon Counting Interferometry to Detect Geontropic Space-Time Fluctuations with GQuEST,” arXiv:2404.07524 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv

[11] [11]

Introduction to the Effective Field Theory Description of Gravity

J. F. Donoghue, “Introduction to the effective field theory description of gravity,” in Advanced School on Effective Theories. 6, 1995. arXiv:gr-qc/9512024

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

[12] [12]

Quantum Gravity in Everyday Life: General Relativity as an Effective Field Theory

C. P. Burgess, “Quantum gravity in everyday life: General relativity as an effective field theory,” Living Rev. Rel. 7 (2004) 5–56, arXiv:gr-qc/0311082

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

[13] [13]

J. F. Donoghue, Quantum General Relativity and Effective Field Theory. 2023. arXiv:2211.09902 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2023

[14] [14]

Spacetime Indeterminacy and Holographic Noise

C. J. Hogan, “Spacetime Indeterminacy and Holographic Noise,” arXiv:0706.1999 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

[15] [15]

Measurement of quantum fluctuations in geometry,

C. J. Hogan, “Measurement of quantum fluctuations in geometry,” Physical Review D 77 no. 10, (2008) 104031

work page 2008

[16] [16]

Observational signatures of quantum gravity in interferometers,

E. P. Verlinde and K. M. Zurek, “Observational signatures of quantum gravity in interferometers,” Phys. Lett. B 822 (2021) 136663, arXiv:1902.08207 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2021

[17] [17]

On vacuum fluctuations in quantum gravity and interferometer arm fluctuations,

K. M. Zurek, “On vacuum fluctuations in quantum gravity and interferometer arm fluctuations,” Phys. Lett. B 826 (2022) 136910, arXiv:2012.05870 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2022

[18] [18]

Interferometer response to geontropic fluctuations,

D. Li, V. S. H. Lee, Y. Chen, and K. M. Zurek, “Interferometer response to geontropic fluctuations,” Phys. Rev. D 107 no. 2, (2023) 024002, arXiv:2209.07543 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023

[19] [19]

Quantum gravity background in next-generation gravitational wave detectors,

M. W. Bub, Y. Chen, Y. Du, D. Li, Y. Zhang, and K. M. Zurek, “Quantum gravity background in next-generation gravitational wave detectors,” Phys. Rev. D 108 no. 6, (2023) 064038, arXiv:2305.11224 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023

[20] [20]

Photons and gravitons in s-matrix theory: derivation of charge conservation and equality of gravitational and inertial mass,

S. Weinberg, “Photons and gravitons in s-matrix theory: derivation of charge conservation and equality of gravitational and inertial mass,” Physical Review 135 no. 4B, (1964) B1049

work page 1964

[21] [21]

Photons and gravitons in perturbation theory: Derivation of maxwell’s and einstein’s equations,

S. Weinberg, “Photons and gravitons in perturbation theory: Derivation of maxwell’s and einstein’s equations,” Physical Review 138 no. 4B, (1965) B988

work page 1965

[22] [22]

The Large N Limit of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity

J. M. Maldacena, “The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 231–252, arXiv:hep-th/9711200

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

[23] [23]

Holography from Conformal Field Theory

I. Heemskerk, J. Penedones, J. Polchinski, and J. Sully, “Holography from Conformal Field Theory,” JHEP 10 (2009) 079, arXiv:0907.0151 [hep-th] . 6

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

[24] [24]

Gravitational Wave Detection with Atom Interferometry

S. Dimopoulos, P. W. Graham, J. M. Hogan, M. A. Kasevich, and S. Rajendran, “Gravitational Wave Detection with Atom Interferometry,” Phys. Lett. B 678 (2009) 37–40, arXiv:0712.1250 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

[25] [25]

Proper Time Observables of General Gravitational Perturbations in Laser Interferometry-based Gravitational Wave Detectors,

V. S. H. Lee and K. M. Zurek, “Proper Time Observables of General Gravitational Perturbations in Laser Interferometry-based Gravitational Wave Detectors,” arXiv:2408.03363 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv

[26] [26]

Correlators of Worldline Proper Length,

A. Sivaramakrishnan, “Correlators of Worldline Proper Length,” arXiv:2406.17205 [hep-th]

work page arXiv

[27] [27]

Maggiore, Gravitational Waves

M. Maggiore, Gravitational Waves. Vol. 1: Theory and Experiments. Oxford University Press, 2007

work page 2007

[28] [28]

Quantum measurements in fundamental physics: a user's manual

J. Beckey, D. Carney, and G. Marocco, “Quantum measurements in fundamental physics: a user’s manual,” arXiv:2311.07270 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

[29] [29]

Maggiore, Gravitational waves, vol

M. Maggiore, Gravitational waves, vol. 2. Oxford university press, 2008

work page 2008

[30] [30]

Input and output in damped quantum systems: Quantum stochastic differential equations and the master equation,

C. W. Gardiner and M. J. Collett, “Input and output in damped quantum systems: Quantum stochastic differential equations and the master equation,” Physical Review A 31 no. 6, (1985) 3761

work page 1985

[31] [31]

Ligo technical document ligo-t0900043

“Ligo technical document ligo-t0900043.” https://dcc.ligo.org/public/0000/T0900043/011/ LIGO-T0900043-11.pdf

work page

[32] [32]

Causality Constraints in Conformal Field Theory

T. Hartman, S. Jain, and S. Kundu, “Causality Constraints in Conformal Field Theory,” JHEP 05 (2016) 099, arXiv:1509.00014 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

[33] [33]

N. D. Birrell and P. C. W. Davies, Quantum Fields in Curved Space. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 1982

work page 1982

[34] [34]

Light-ray operators in conformal field theory,

P. Kravchuk and D. Simmons-Duffin, “Light-ray operators in conformal field theory,” JHEP 11 (2018) 102, arXiv:1805.00098 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2018

[35] [35]

Introduction to quantum noise, measurement, and amplification,

A. A. Clerk, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, F. Marquardt, and R. J. Schoelkopf, “Introduction to quantum noise, measurement, and amplification,” Reviews of Modern Physics 82 no. 2, (2010) 1155–1208

work page 2010

[36] [36]

Unification of thermal and quantum noises in gravitational-wave detectors,

C. Whittle, L. McCuller, V. Sudhir, and M. Evans, “Unification of thermal and quantum noises in gravitational-wave detectors,” Physical Review Letters 130 no. 24, (2023) 241401. 7 Appendix A: Geodesics and singularities Here we give a few more details in the geometric cal- culations of Sec. I, and in particular some discussion on the choice of iϵ prescrip...

work page 2023