Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

"A Woman is More Culturally Knowledgeable than A Man?": The Effect of Personas on Cultural Norm Interpretation in LLMs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.11636 v1 pith:HHYF4G47 submitted 2024-09-18 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords normllmspersonasocialpersonculturalinterpretationpersonas
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

As the deployment of large language models (LLMs) expands, there is an increasing demand for personalized LLMs. One method to personalize and guide the outputs of these models is by assigning a persona -- a role that describes the expected behavior of the LLM (e.g., a man, a woman, an engineer). This study investigates whether an LLM's understanding of social norms varies across assigned personas. Ideally, the perception of a social norm should remain consistent regardless of the persona, since acceptability of a social norm should be determined by the region the norm originates from, rather than by individual characteristics such as gender, body size, or race. A norm is universal within its cultural context. In our research, we tested 36 distinct personas from 12 sociodemographic categories (e.g., age, gender, beauty) across four different LLMs. We find that LLMs' cultural norm interpretation varies based on the persona used and the norm interpretation also varies within a sociodemographic category (e.g., a fat person and a thin person as in physical appearance group) where an LLM with the more socially desirable persona (e.g., a thin person) interprets social norms more accurately than with the less socially desirable persona (e.g., a fat person). We also discuss how different types of social biases may contribute to the results that we observe.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Demographic Prompting at Scale: When More Attributes Hurt LLM--Human Agreement

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

    Across five subjective tasks and five open-source LLMs, demographic prompting improves human agreement only for 1–3 high-signal, directionally coherent attributes and degrades under the full attribute set.

  2. Assessing the Reliability of LLMs Annotations in the Context of Demographic Bias and Model Explanation

    cs.CL 2025-07 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Demographics explain only about 8% of variance in sexism annotations, persona-prompted LLMs do not reliably beat baselines, and SHAP-guided highlighting helps smaller models.

  3. Surface Fairness, Deep Bias: A Comparative Study of Bias in Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Language models show negligible persona-based differences on MMLU benchmarks but large, income-relevant differences when asked for salary negotiation advice.

Pith tools