Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

CI-Bench: Benchmarking Contextual Integrity of AI Assistants on Synthetic Data

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.13903 v1 pith:XW34DAD6 submitted 2024-09-20 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords assistantsdataci-benchincludinginformationpersonalsyntheticacross
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Advances in generative AI point towards a new era of personalized applications that perform diverse tasks on behalf of users. While general AI assistants have yet to fully emerge, their potential to share personal data raises significant privacy challenges. This paper introduces CI-Bench, a comprehensive synthetic benchmark for evaluating the ability of AI assistants to protect personal information during model inference. Leveraging the Contextual Integrity framework, our benchmark enables systematic assessment of information flow across important context dimensions, including roles, information types, and transmission principles. We present a novel, scalable, multi-step synthetic data pipeline for generating natural communications, including dialogues and emails. Unlike previous work with smaller, narrowly focused evaluations, we present a novel, scalable, multi-step data pipeline that synthetically generates natural communications, including dialogues and emails, which we use to generate 44 thousand test samples across eight domains. Additionally, we formulate and evaluate a naive AI assistant to demonstrate the need for further study and careful training towards personal assistant tasks. We envision CI-Bench as a valuable tool for guiding future language model development, deployment, system design, and dataset construction, ultimately contributing to the development of AI assistants that align with users' privacy expectations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. PiSAs: Benchmarking Contextual Integrity in Multi-User Agentic Systems

    cs.MA 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A benchmark of 85 manually curated workplace scenarios reveals that multi-user AI agent systems suffer high rates of contextual integrity violations across outputs, inter-agent communication, and shared memory.

  2. Context Reasoner: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability for Contextualized Privacy and Safety Compliance via Reinforcement Learning

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A Context Reasoner pipeline that cold-starts LLMs on distilled legal reasoning and applies PPO with a rule-based compliance reward improves performance on CI-based legal compliance benchmarks and transfers to general ...

  3. A Comprehensive Survey of Deep Research: Systems, Methodologies, and Applications

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey of 80+ Deep Research systems that proposes a four-layer taxonomy (foundation models, tool use, planning, synthesis) and compares commercial and open-source implementations.

Pith tools