Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

CUTE: Measuring LLMs' Understanding of Their Tokens

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.15452 v2 pith:DNQMSDSW submitted 2024-09-23 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords llmscutetokensinformationknowledgeorthographicquestiontasks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) show remarkable performance on a wide variety of tasks. Most LLMs split text into multi-character tokens and process them as atomic units without direct access to individual characters. This raises the question: To what extent can LLMs learn orthographic information? To answer this, we propose a new benchmark, CUTE, which features a collection of tasks designed to test the orthographic knowledge of LLMs. We evaluate popular LLMs on CUTE, finding that most of them seem to know the spelling of their tokens, yet fail to use this information effectively to manipulate text, calling into question how much of this knowledge is generalizable.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. TASE: Token Awareness and Structured Evaluation for Multilingual Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    TASE benchmark shows LLMs lag humans on token-level and structural language tasks across Chinese, English, and Korean despite strong high-level performance.

Pith tools