REVIEW 2 cited by
Vision Language Models See What You Want but not What You See
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Knowing others' intentions and taking others' perspectives are two core components of human intelligence that are considered to be instantiations of theory-of-mind. Infiltrating machines with these abilities is an important step towards building human-level artificial intelligence. Here, to investigate intentionality understanding and level-2 perspective-taking in Vision Language Models (VLMs), we constructed the IntentBench and PerspectBench, which together contains over 300 cognitive experiments grounded in real-world scenarios and classic cognitive tasks. We found VLMs achieving high performance on intentionality understanding but low performance on level-2 perspective-taking. This suggests a potential dissociation between simulation-based and theory-based theory-of-mind abilities in VLMs, highlighting the concern that they are not capable of using model-based reasoning to infer others' mental states.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Egocentric Bias in Vision-Language Models
Most vision-language models fail Level-2 visual perspective taking: they report the camera's view rather than the 180°-rotated string, even though they often recognize that another agent sees differently.
-
Towards Embodied Cognition in Robots via Spatially Grounded Synthetic Worlds
The paper releases a procedural synthetic dataset of single-cube scenes with ground-truth pose matrices as a foundation for training VLMs in spatial reasoning.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.