REVIEW 3 cited by
SecCoder: Towards Generalizable and Robust Secure Code Generation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
After large models (LMs) have gained widespread acceptance in code-related tasks, their superior generative capacity has greatly promoted the application of the code LM. Nevertheless, the security of the generated code has raised attention to its potential damage. Existing secure code generation methods have limited generalizability to unseen test cases and poor robustness against the attacked model, leading to safety failures in code generation. In this paper, we propose a generalizable and robust secure code generation method SecCoder by using in-context learning (ICL) and the safe demonstration. The dense retriever is also used to select the most helpful demonstration to maximize the improvement of the generated code's security. Experimental results show the superior generalizability of the proposed model SecCoder compared to the current secure code generation method, achieving a significant security improvement of an average of 7.20% on unseen test cases. The results also show the better robustness of SecCoder compared to the current attacked code LM, achieving a significant security improvement of an average of 7.74%. Our analysis indicates that SecCoder enhances the security of LMs in generating code, and it is more generalizable and robust.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Training Language Models to Generate Quality Code with Program Analysis Feedback
REAL trains LLMs with rewards from program analysis and unit tests, improving joint functionality and code quality over prior methods.
-
GoodVibe: Security-by-Vibe for LLM-Based Code Generation
Retraining only the neurons most responsive to security judgments raises a code LLM's default safe-code rate to 87.5% on C++ (average) with about 1.9 million trainable parameters.
-
Position: Intelligent Coding Systems Should Write Programs with Justifications
A position paper advocating that intelligent coding systems should accompany code with justified explanations that are cognitively aligned and semantically faithful.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.