Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Deliberate Reasoning in Language Models as Structure-Aware Planning with an Accurate World Model

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.03136 v4 pith:DQWPOYBJ submitted 2024-10-04 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords reasoningswapmodelworldcandidateslanguagemodelsplanning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Enhancing the reasoning capabilities of language models (LMs) remains a key challenge, especially for tasks that require complex, multi-step decision-making where existing Chain-of-Thought (CoT) approaches struggle with consistency and verification. In this paper, we propose a novel reasoning framework, referred to as Structure-aware Planning with an Accurate World Model (SWAP), that integrates structured knowledge representation with learned planning. Unlike prior methods that rely purely on natural language reasoning, SWAP leverages entailment graphs to encode structured dependencies and enable symbolic verification of intermediate steps. To systematically construct and update the graph, SWAP employs a policy model to propose candidate expansions and a world model to predict structural updates. To improve accuracy, the world model generates multiple alternative updates, and a discriminator re-ranks them based on plausibility. To encourage diverse exploration, we introduce Diversity-based Modelling (DM), which samples candidates from the remaining probability mass after removing previously sampled candidates from the original policy distribution. Additionally, SWAP improves the discrimination accuracy through Contrastive Ranking (CR), which directly compares candidates within prompts and incorporates meta-knowledge to improve ranking quality. We evaluate SWAP across diverse reasoning-intensive benchmarks including math reasoning, logical reasoning, and coding tasks. Extensive experiments demonstrate that SWAP significantly improves upon the base models and consistently outperforms existing reasoning methods.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Graph-Enhanced Policy Optimization in LLM Agent Training

    cs.AI 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    GEPO adds graph-centrality-based intrinsic rewards, dynamic discounts, and two-level advantage shaping to group-based RL, improving LLM agent success on ALFWorld, WebShop, and a private Workbench benchmark.

  2. SAND: Boosting LLM Agents with Self-Taught Action Deliberation

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A self-training framework that uses self-consistency action sampling and execution-guided critiques to teach LLM agents to explicitly deliberate over candidate actions, improving average rewards by about 20% over supe...

Pith tools