Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Are Expert-Level Language Models Expert-Level Annotators?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.03254 v1 pith:LQJWLGNI submitted 2024-10-04 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords annotatorsdataexpert-levelllmsdomainsknowledgeacrossalternative
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Data annotation refers to the labeling or tagging of textual data with relevant information. A large body of works have reported positive results on leveraging LLMs as an alternative to human annotators. However, existing studies focus on classic NLP tasks, and the extent to which LLMs as data annotators perform in domains requiring expert knowledge remains underexplored. In this work, we investigate comprehensive approaches across three highly specialized domains and discuss practical suggestions from a cost-effectiveness perspective. To the best of our knowledge, we present the first systematic evaluation of LLMs as expert-level data annotators.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Evaluating Large Language Models as Expert Annotators

    cs.CL 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Material Fingerprinting recovers the form and parameters of hyperelastic material models by nearest-neighbor matching of test data against a simulated fingerprint database: exact at zero noise, degrading under 5% noise.

  2. Exploring the Potential of LLMs for Serendipity Evaluation in Recommender Systems

    cs.IR 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Basic and multi-model LLM prompts can evaluate recommendation serendipity as well as or better than standard proxy formulas, reaching 21.5% Pearson correlation with user-study ratings.

  3. How Significant Are the Real Performance Gains? An Unbiased Evaluation Framework for GraphRAG

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new GraphRAG evaluation framework using graph-grounded questions and bias-correction yields much smaller win rates than earlier reports, casting doubt on reported GraphRAG gains.

  4. ACD-CLIP: Decoupling Representation and Dynamic Fusion for Zero-Shot Anomaly Detection

    cs.CV 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    ACD-CLIP improves zero-shot anomaly detection by co-designing a convolutional low-rank adapter with a dynamic fusion gateway that modulates text prompts from visual context.

Pith tools