REVIEW 1 cited by
Oracle Separation Between Quantum Commitments and Quantum One-wayness
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
We show that there exists an oracle relative to which quantum commitments exist but no (efficiently verifiable) one-way state generators exist. Both have been widely considered candidates for replacing one-way functions as the minimal assumption for cryptography: the weakest cryptographic assumption implied by all of computational cryptography. Recent work has shown that commitments can be constructed from one-way state generators, but the other direction has remained open. Our results rule out any black-box construction, and thus settles this crucial open problem, suggesting that quantum commitments (as well as its equivalency class of EFI pairs, quantum oblivious transfer, and secure quantum multiparty computation) appear to be strictly weakest among all known cryptographic primitives.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
The Hardness of Learning Quantum Circuits and its Cryptographic Applications
Secure quantum cryptography (one-way state generators, signatures, commitments, encryption) is constructed from new conjectures about the hardness of learning and cloning random quantum circuit outputs.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.